Search

Rachael Braun

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
66 matches · 45W–21L · seasons 20192022
Where Rachael sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Rachael is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachael has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rachael has gone from the 92nd to the 80th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.2% of games
3.0
64.9%
24W–13L · 53.6% of games
3.5
81%
17W–4L · 61% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
W
2022-03-16 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Vermeys
+0.024better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Cindi Ray / Louise Rice
2022-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rose Gerrard
+0.031better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2022-02-18 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine Yarde
0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2021-11-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerri Comings
0.008about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Diane Paull / Barbie Quinn
2021-10-27 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rose Gerrard
+0.015better than expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2021-10-20 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Vermeys
0.009better than expected — took 100% of games against 86% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2021-10-13 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Vermeys
0.021about as expected — took 63% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Judith Kraus / Deborah Graham
2021-03-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Gobel
+0.015better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2021-03-17 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Beirise
+0.047better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2021-03-15 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Lockrem
0.014below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Karen Kiyono / Laurie Lenhart
2021-02-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Gobel
0.016below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2020-12-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Moy
0.017about as expected — took 65% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.