← Search

Tamara Dungan

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2023
69 matches · 20W–49L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Tamara sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Tamara is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tamara has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Tamara has gone from the 14th to the 0th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
34.2%
13W–25L · 45.3% of games
3.5
30.4%
7W–16L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 26.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
L
2023-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Rosenthal
−0.004below expectation — took 8% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2023-03-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Rosenthal
−0.042below expectation — took 41% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Misti Webb / Andi Berger
2023-03-08 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Rosenthal
+0.029about as expected — took 29% of games against 26% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2023-03-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Sinnock
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ning Li
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 17% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2023-02-22 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Jones
−0.040below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-02-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Waldo Feng
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Kayleen Krahenbuhl / Amy Rogers
2023-02-01 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Brooks
−0.050below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-01-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Meier
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Liliya Pummill / Rachael Boyle
2022-11-16 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Lawton
−0.066below expectation — took 0% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Rosenthal
−0.029below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Wendy Cardenas / Amy Childs
2022-09-21 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Lawton
−0.003about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.