← Search

Ethan Goldman-Kirst

Seattle, WA
0.0 year-end
48 matches · 28W–20L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Ethan sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Ethan is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ethan has been 4.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Ethan has gone from the 88th to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 65.3% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
W
2022-12-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristy Braunston
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Jeff Chaney / Ashley Moisemixed
2022-09-23 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vicky Pan
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2022-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Cheung
+0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Christoph Schmidt-Warnecke / Aleksey Ovchinnikov
2022-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vu Dinh
−0.011below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Mayoor Tandon / Mark Peterson
2022-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tue Khuc
−0.024below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2021-12-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Esther Kim
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2021-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chen-Yi Chou
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2021-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristin Gallagher
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2021-11-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bree Olofson
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Carlos Carrizozachamps
2021-10-16 · #2 Singles
−0.016below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Joshua Luo / Jean-Claude Dallieschamps
2021-10-15 · #1 Doubles · with Martin Goldman-Kirst
−0.021below expectation — took 35% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Alex Camara / Michael Dix
2021-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Goldman-Kirst
−0.012about as expected — took 71% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.