← Search

Edward Hocker

Marysville, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
178 matches · 96W–82L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Edward sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Edward is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Edward has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920202021202220242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Edward has gone from the 69th to the 79th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
62.1%
64W–39L · 57.2% of games
4.0
34.5%
10W–19L · 46.2% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.9% of games
7.0mixed
27.8%
5W–13L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history178 matches
L
2025-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Hanson
−0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Timothy Greenzweig / John Baik
2025-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Stiebritz
−0.015below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Rob Vander Stoep / Jonathan Borgida
2025-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zyskowski
−0.010about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Stiebritz
+0.033better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zyskowski
+0.014better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Jared Kirschenbaum / Gary Renville
2025-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zyskowski
−0.035below expectation — took 58% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Kim-Himmelfarb
−0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zyskowski
+0.004better than expected — took 100% of games against 82% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Gregory Snow / Nik Garkusha
2025-03-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zyskowski
+0.046better than expected — took 86% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-02-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zyskowski
−0.009about as expected — took 56% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zyskowski
−0.030below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Manivel Chandrasekaran / Rama Krishnam Raju Pakalapati
2025-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zyskowski
+0.005better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.