Search

Morgan Shook

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
78 matches · 49W–29L · seasons 20192026
Where Morgan sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Morgan is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Morgan has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Morgan has gone from the 32nd to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
64.5%
20W–11L · 55.9% of games
3.5
42.9%
12W–16L · 46.6% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mien Chi Chen
0.039below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Noah Neubauer / Andrew Vincentchamps
2025-06-14 · #2 Doubles · with Christopher Cahoon
+0.056better than expected — took 54% of games against 34% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Renxuan Wang / Sid Nagendranchamps
2025-06-08 · #2 Doubles · with Christopher Cahoon
+0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-06-07 · #2 Doubles · with Christopher Cahoon
+0.034better than expected — took 60% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Mike Bursiek / Peter Claassen
2025-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Rousso
+0.001about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-04 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.022below expectation — took 47% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Bill Do / Michael Green
2025-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Rousso
+0.035better than expected — took 65% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Holland
+0.010better than expected — took 55% of games against 48% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-29 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.058better than expected — took 47% of games against 31% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Pramod Raghavendran / Krishna Addepalli
2025-02-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Wilson
+0.012better than expected — took 58% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ravi Bhangare
0.030below expectation — took 47% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Subu Sankara Subramanian
+0.024better than expected — took 40% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.