Search

Courtney Casem

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
73 matches · 43W–30L · seasons 20202025
Where Courtney sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Courtney is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Courtney has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02020202120242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Courtney has gone from the 37th to the 94th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
68.6%
24W–11L · 58.5% of games
3.0
44.8%
13W–16L · 52.2% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
L
Anna Clark / Melissa Ruediger
2025-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Palichat
0.015below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Sandra Walford / Rita Abboud
2024-12-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Stowe
0.032below expectation — took 60% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natasha Kattau
0.002better than expected — took 86% of games against 74% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Helen McDaniel / Julie Brown
2024-11-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Mitchell
0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Nadine Kluger / Melissa Saragosa
2024-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Palichat
+0.031better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Taylor Larson / Margaret Bruno
2024-10-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Perez
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jeannie Collins / Jennifer Covington
2024-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Hicks
0.020below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
N/A
2024-10-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Stowe
+0.078better than expected — took 100% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-09-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Morrison
0.040below expectation — took 68% of games against 76% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
N/A
2024-08-12 · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
+0.096better than expected — took 100% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Nicole Lefebvre
2021-10-30 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.033better than expected — took 45% of games against 34% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2021-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Maxwell
0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.