← Search

James Wichert

— year-end
92 matches · 57W–35L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add James Wichert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2022-03-23 · NV/TERRY/ADULT 55 & OVER M6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Corey Zimet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-03-12 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Cimber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-03-02 · NV/TERRY/65&OVERM6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Corey Zimet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2022-02-26 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Horton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2022-02-25 · DTC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Cereghino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2022-02-23 · NV/TERRY/65&OVERM6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Corey Zimet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-02-12 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2022-02-11 · DTC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Cereghino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2022-02-09 · NV/TERRY/65&OVERM6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Corey Zimet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
Wayne Hamm / Eugene OCallaghan
2022-02-05 · #1 Doubles · with Corey Zimet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-6
L
John Goulett / Daniel Hofeditz
2022-02-04 · #1 Doubles · with Corey Zimet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
Jim Ducey / John McManus
2022-02-04 · #1 Doubles · with Corey Zimet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams21 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
55%
22W–18L · 52.9% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 60% of games
6.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 63% of games
7.0
80%
16W–4L · 61.2% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
13 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
3 matches
#3 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer