← Search

Ana Yambrek

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
286 matches · 212W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history286 matches
W
2026-08-09 · Lewis/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with E'Lane Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · Douglas/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Edwards
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-11 · Douglas/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Sheahan
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-28 · Douglas/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Lewis
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · Arbelaez/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Lewis
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · Arbelaez/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angie Tyner
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-13 · Bennett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isabel Xu
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-11-11 · Klepper/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Isabel Xu
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-11-06 · Bennett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Edwards
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-21 · Bennett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Parker Justice
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-10-11 · Klepper/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Bennett
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-16 · Justice/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Hill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams108 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
87%
20W–3L · 68.1% of games
3.0
85.7%
30W–5L · 70.2% of games
3.5
90.9%
30W–3L · 69.9% of games
4.0
75%
63W–21L · 58.7% of games
4.5
30%
6W–14L · 36.6% of games
5.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 77.6% of games
6.5
80%
16W–4L · 67.1% of games
7.5
56.7%
17W–13L · 52.9% of games
8.5
90%
9W–1L · 63.2% of games
4.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 44.9% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
53 matches
#1 Singles
9%
27 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams