Search

Rachel Connell

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
60 matches · 34W–26L · seasons 20202026
Where Rachel sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Rachel is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
MPRC-Lanier/Noble
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
MPRC-Skoog/Noble
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
MPRC-Lanier/Noble
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
MPRC-Nies/Schnadig
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2024
MPRC-Skoog/Noble
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
MPRC-Cook
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachel has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rachel has gone from the 96th to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 67.2% of games
3.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 61.5% of games
3.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 54.3% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 46.1% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-06-07 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.086better than expected — took 92% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Blythe Garma
2026-05-02 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.055below expectation — took 8% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-06-22 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-06-14 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Ericson
+0.025better than expected — took 100% of games against 74% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-07 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Garrene Mcgale
0.075below expectation — took 14% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-05-18 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanna Conan
0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-05-04 · MPRC-Lanier/Noble · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jing Li
0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-01 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.006about as expected — took 55% of games against 57% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-02-09 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.014below expectation — took 39% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 4-2
L
2025-01-19 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.046better than expected — took 41% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2024-06-02 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.068better than expected — took 86% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Erin Corzine
2024-05-04 · MPRC-Skoog/Noble · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.036better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.