← Search

Whitney Garrett

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 80W–32L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Whitney Garrett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-06-05 · TCSP-Fletcher · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · TCSP-Fletcher · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · TCSP-Bad Bunnies-Liu · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sydney Bloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
Tana Harris
2026-04-12 · TCSP-Bad Bunnies-Liu · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-03 · TCSP-Bad Bunnies-Liu · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jutta Maas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-03-28 · TCSP-Bad Bunnies-Liu · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-27 · TCSP-Fletcher · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-15 · TCSP-Co(ed) Conspiracy and Racqueteering-Garrett · #1 Female Singles · 4.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6
W
2026-01-04 · TCSP-Co(ed) Conspiracy and Racqueteering-Garrett · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Deanna Ellmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-5
L
2026-01-04 · TCSP-Co(ed) Conspiracy and Racqueteering-Garrett · #1 Female Singles · 4.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6
L
2026-01-04 · TCSP-Co(ed) Conspiracy and Racqueteering-Garrett · #1 Mixed Doubles · 4.0 · with Clay Dudley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
L
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · with Clay Dudley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.7% of games
3.5
100%
11W–0L · 71.1% of games
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.9% of games
4.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 51.3% of games
3.5mixed
88.9%
16W–2L · 74.1% of games
4.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.7% of games
8.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 64.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 20% of the time
#1 Singles
20%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
18 matches
#1 Female Singles
16%
18 matches
#1 Female Doubles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
11%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert