← Search

Sarah Benevento

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Champaign, IL
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 64W–42L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history106 matches
L
2026-07-01 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Harmon-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lijian Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Harmon-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Kuehn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Harmon-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Borden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-07 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Harmon-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Borden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-03 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Kim
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Novitsky
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-01 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cynthia Ottemann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-11-01 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dorothy Deschler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-10-25 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sally Boland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-25 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caroline Cox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-28 · MSIL/Hoag18&O4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-1
W
2025-05-14 · MSIL/Hoag18&O4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Novitsky
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
65.4%
17W–9L · 59.3% of games
4.0
60%
6W–4L · 55.4% of games
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 75.3% of games
7.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 55.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 50.9% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova