Search

Claudia Porter

Portland, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
64 matches · 12W–52L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
98%
stay 2.5
2%
up to 3.0

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 2.5
27 of 34
OR · 2.5
48 of 61

Claudia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Claudia has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Claudia has gone from the 25th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 44.1% of games
3.0
3.3%
1W–29L · 22.2% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
16.7%
3W–15L · 32.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
L
Yuxin Luochamps
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles
+0.010below expectation — took 14% of games against 23% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Heather Long
2026-06-14 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.030better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Anabel Capalbo
2026-06-06 · #1 Singles · 2.5
0.028below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Philberta Leung
2026-04-19 · #1 Singles · 2.5
0.042below expectation — took 8% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Alison Heath
2026-04-04 · #1 Singles · 2.5
0.086below expectation — took 14% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-06 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.022better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Lilia Boyer
2026-01-31 · #1 Singles · 2.5
0.018below expectation — took 56% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Hodges
+0.048better than expected — took 53% of games against 36% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Elizabeth Harrison / Christine Vuong
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Hodges
+0.006about as expected — took 62% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Koenigsberg
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Nicole Alvarez / Martha Tolentino
2025-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Hodges
0.018below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Amy Tam-naulty
2025-06-01 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.048better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.