← Search

Daniel Silberman

Gig Harbor, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
103 matches · 43W–60L · seasons 2020–2025
Where Daniel sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Daniel is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Daniel has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520202022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Daniel has gone from the 2nd to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
61.8%
21W–13L · 53% of games
3.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 45.8% of games
6.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 46.1% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history103 matches
L
Mary Sheryll Tan / Richard Triquartmixed
2025-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Snyder
+0.000below expectation — took 32% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Snyder
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Mills
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Snyder
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Oliver Silberman
+0.023better than expected — took 59% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jocelyn Devita
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Christopher Stickney / Tristan Carlson
2025-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bentley Brandt
+0.052better than expected — took 80% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Monica Ghambari / Colin Engmixed
2025-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Snyder
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Travis Westfall / Anders Cramer
2025-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Oliver Silberman
+0.038better than expected — took 50% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Oliver Alcantara / Cleo Ravanera
2025-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bentley Brandt
+0.032better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Brady Miller / Scott Nicholson
2025-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Pringle
−0.041below expectation — took 8% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Kyle Bowman / David Anderson
2025-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Garrett Kingman
+0.025better than expected — took 54% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.