← Search

Eva Zaleski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fountain Hills, AZ
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 4W–13L · seasons 2022–2024
Match history17 matches
L
2024-02-15 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65S · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Grace Vogel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-01-06 · 6.0 MTC Racquettes W55F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynda Michaluk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-12-09 · 6.0 MTC Racquettes W55F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Stryker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2023-10-21 · 6.0 MTC Racquettes W55F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annette Younkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2023-10-19 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Stryker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-10-12 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annette Younkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-03-30 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65S · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Eppers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
W
2023-03-23 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65S · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Eppers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-02-23 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65S · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anna Gillespie
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
W
2023-01-12 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Campbell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-01-05 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sharon Hall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-12-15 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Stryker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2023–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova