← Search

John Calcott

— year-end
24 matches · 2W–22L · seasons 2020–2022

Captains: add John Calcott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
W
2022-03-13 · NNM 3.0M ACC - Gonzales · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charles Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2022-03-10 · NNM 3.0M ACC - Gonzales · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Gonzales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Phuong Nguyen
2022-03-06 · NNM 3.0M ACC - Gonzales · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-11-07 · NNM 6.0MX JC - Chambliss · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Matthews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
Glenn Felty / Jennifer Stephens
2021-10-17 · NNM 6.0MX JC - Chambliss · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karoline Bota mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2021-10-13 · NNM 7.0M ACC - Calcott · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2021-10-06 · NNM 7.0M ACC - Calcott · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Feibelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2021-09-29 · NNM 7.0M ACC - Calcott · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Gonzales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2021-09-22 · NNM 7.0M ACC - Calcott · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2021-09-09 · NNM 7.0M ACC - Calcott · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2021-06-24 · NNM 3.0M TCA - Kozlowski · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2021-06-23 · NNM 3.0M TCA - Kozlowski · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ramon Sosaya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Teams6 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
20%
2W–8L · 33.3% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 27.9% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 21.1% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova