← Search

Sheila Marshall

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CARMEL, IN
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 26W–44L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Melcher · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Gilbert
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Melcher · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Gilbert
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Mowry · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Gilbert
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Mowry · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kriss Bowes
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Mowry · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kriss Bowes
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Melcher · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Gilbert
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Warr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2023-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Brase
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Brase
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Christensen
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 52.1% of games
3.5
31.6%
12W–26L · 44.1% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
45%
9W–11L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova