Search

Scott Fitzsimmons

Lake Tapps, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
47 matches · 25W–22L · seasons 20192024
Where Scott sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Scott is one of 775 men at 3.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 24% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Scott has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Scott has gone from the 66th to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
8W–8L · 52.1% of games
6.0
60%
12W–8L · 54.8% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
L
2024-06-22 · #1 Doubles · with Roger Hebert
0.028below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Roger Hebert
+0.007better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Matthew Schwartz / MARK MILLERchamps
2024-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Roger Hebert
+0.025better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Hebert
+0.019better than expected — took 57% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Anthony Jackson / Will Pelleteri
2024-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roger Hebert
0.013about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Hebert
+0.004about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Hebert
+0.024better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Lockett
+0.024better than expected — took 61% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steven Storms
0.057below expectation — took 33% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-11-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Lockett
0.043below expectation — took 35% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Barron Willis / Dan Crowell
2023-10-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Lockett
+0.008better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-10-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Hebert
0.013below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.