← Search

Kailee Christie

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2023
73 matches · 40W–33L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Kailee sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Kailee is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kailee has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Kailee has gone from the 51st to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 50.6% of games
4.0
51.5%
17W–16L · 52.8% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
W
Laura Brown / Amanda Lindsaychamps
2023-10-01 · #3 Doubles · with Amy Levasseur
−0.015below expectation — took 44% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Heidi Locke Simonchamps
2023-09-30 · #1 Singles
−0.007below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
Mari Valvo / Jennifer Pauldurai
2023-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Ryan
−0.014below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Blanca Avila / Nancy Holland
2023-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Levasseur
+0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2023-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Winston
−0.019below expectation — took 47% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamaica Tan
−0.034below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Rachael Boyle / Liliya Pummill
2023-03-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tami Vannah
−0.071below expectation — took 29% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Hillary Hall / Julie Tontapanish
2022-12-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Pham
+0.041better than expected — took 38% of games against 27% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2022-11-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Pham
+0.022better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Sonia Vermeys / Valerie Murphy
2022-10-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophy Feng
−0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Liana Gonzalez / Cecilia Tetlowchamps
2022-10-16 · #3 Doubles · with Claudia Sleet
−0.016below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2022-10-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Perez
−0.041below expectation — took 43% of games against 60% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.