← Search

Peter Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Washington, DC
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 18W–30L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history48 matches
L
2024-08-13 · Sons of Forest Hills · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard McKeon
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-15 · Sons of Forest Hills · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Seidel
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-06 · String Theory · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Rawlings
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-11-19 · Defenders · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bob Levering
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-11-08 · Defenders · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Richard McKeon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2023-10-28 · Defenders · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Majed Hamawy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2023-10-23 · Defenders · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Raymond Barry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2023-08-27 · Sons of Forest Hills · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Baum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
L
2023-08-21 · Sons of Forest Hills · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard McKeon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-07-08 · Sons of Forest Hills · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard McKeon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 5-6
L
2023-02-18 · Defenders · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-02-03 · Defenders · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Richard McKeon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 43.8% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.1% of games
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 54.7% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 38% of games
8.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 34.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert