Search

Cindy Hagans

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
57 matches · 14W–43L · seasons 20192022
Where Cindy sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Cindy is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cindy has been a steady 4.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Cindy has gone from the 13th to the 7th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
4.0
24.6%
14W–43L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history57 matches
L
Mary Ford / Shelley Shalev
2022-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie MacDonald
0.022below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2022-01-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milly Joyner
0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Theresa Melville / Susan Langer
2021-12-13 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julienne Yager
0.044below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Carrie Whipple / Karen Miller
2021-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Lawson
+0.037better than expected — took 56% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2021-10-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Andrews
+0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
Stephanie Cook / Charlotte Hart
2021-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Kaufman
0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Jennifer Richards / Candra Milohnic
2021-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Little
0.026below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
JoAnna Edmonston / Jessa Schaid
2021-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Lawson
0.038below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Melodie Ewing / Anne Alba
2021-10-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Soong
+0.061better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
N/A
2021-09-20 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie MacDonald
0.058about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2021-09-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milly Joyner
+0.031better than expected — took 47% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Emily Adams / Nancy Hsu
2021-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Lawson
0.029below expectation — took 0% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.