← Search

Pam Russell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Howell, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 8W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history31 matches
L
2026-08-03 · NAC-Mondragon 55s 8.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Hermiz
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-06 · NAC-Mondragon 55s 8.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Hermiz
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-08 · NAC-Mondragon 55s 8.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jan Schlaff
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-04 · 6NAC-MONDRAGON 80DW MO 55&O SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ami Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-21 · 6NAC-MONDRAGON 80DW MO 55&O SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jan Schlaff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-11 · 6NAC-MONDRAGON 80DW MO 55&O SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ami Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-06-02 · 6NAC-MONDRAGON 80DW MO 55&O SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Izzo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-15 · 4NAC-MONDRAGON AD40&O WED 40 DW SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Izzo
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-05-29 · 4NAC-MONDRAGON AD40&O WED 40 DW SEM F2 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Cirulis
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-07-14 · 1NAC-MONDRAGON AD40&O 40DW WED SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Schlaff
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-06-28 · 1NAC-MONDRAGON AD40&O 40DW WED SEM F2 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Rodriguez
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-06-14 · 1NAC-MONDRAGON AD40&O 40DW WED SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Kelly
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
20%
4W–16L · 41.9% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert