← Search

Rich Waltz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Issaquah, WA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 19W–24L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history43 matches
L
2026-10-11 · RW · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-12 · RW · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · RW · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-26 · Rich W · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · Rich W · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-28 · Rich W · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-22 · Rich W · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-09 · EDG-Mana-Lew · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Renee Waltz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-03 · EDG-Mana-Lew · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria Recchi mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-28 · EDG-Mana-Lew · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Renee Waltz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-05-07 · Rich W · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2024-05-05 · EDG-Hirai · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 54.8% of games
4.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 38.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 70% of the time
#1 Singles
70%
30 matches
#2 Singles
21%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer