Teams

Sterling Oaks / Wheeler

2025 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-01vs Colliers Reserve / TellerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Lynda Giannetta vs Lynn Lauck / Betty Sayad1-6, 2-6
2025-02-10vs COLLIER/North/65&Over7.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynda Giannetta / Claudia Hammon vs Gail Morley / Denise Spears3-6, 1-6
2025-02-03vs Sterling Oaks / GlobermanLost 01
L#3 DoublesFran Goodrow / Cheryl Cacciotti vs Val Bischof / Kathleen Donnalley5-7, 2-6
2025-01-20vs Colliers Reserve / TellerLost 02
L#2 DoublesLani Wheeler / Claudia Hammon vs Nancy Schultz / Mary Taylor1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesFran Goodrow / Cheryl Cacciotti vs Mari Miller-Bal / Marion Malone2-6, 1-6
2025-01-06vs COLLIER/North/65&Over7.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesLynda Giannetta / Claudia Hammon vs Heidi Nettler / Joanna Giampoli6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Barbara Beard
published 4
3.06
Cheryl Cacciotti
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Claudia Hammon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Julie Waldon
published
Elisabeth Beck
published
Jennifer Heimmel
published
Lani Wheeler
published
Lynda Giannetta
published
Tina Doria
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Heimmel + Lynda Giannetta0531% gamesnot enough data
Elisabeth Beck + Lani Wheeler314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Beard
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
3
Cheryl Cacciotti
67W–85L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3.5
Claudia Hammon
80W–104L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.94
Julie Waldon
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Elisabeth Beck
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Heimmel
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lani Wheeler
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynda Giannetta
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Doria
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.