Teams

Fowler Park (Kim Gillon)*

USTA Atlanta Spring - 65 & Over Women · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-20vs Rock Springs (Pam Williams)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesSue Stovall / Lory Tuholski vs Randi Nelson / Elaine Schenck6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWanda Grant / Elaine Wood vs Michele Gregory / Stewart Mary Jo6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNina Day / Linda Douglas vs Nancy Nash / Debbie Underwood3-6, 2-6
2026-03-13vs Fowler Park (Vickie Quinn)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesElaine Wood / Robin Johnson vs Lynn Alexander / Vickie Quinn6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEverely Lawrence / Barbara Gauthier vs Elizabeth Hardin / Terry Graham6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJanet Sadler-Akers / Linda Douglas vs Sandra Ford / Yvette Cronon6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesWanda Grant / Elaine Wood vs Linda Doss / Adrienne Marting1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEverely Lawrence / Gayle Bryan vs Barbara Pasko / Linda Ward4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBarbara Gauthier / Kathleen Petro vs Judith Fulk / Mary Younie6-3, 6-4
2026-02-20vs Parsons Run (Danelle Haakenson)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesEverely Lawrence / Robin Johnson vs Dorothy Pahner / Sandra Depa6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWanda Grant / Janet Sadler-Akers vs Pearline Franco / Barbara Nathan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNina Day / Gayle Bryan vs Carolyn Waters / Linda Damsker6-0, 6-0
2026-02-13vs Fowler Park (Roxie Franks)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesLory Tuholski / Robin Johnson vs Laura Dodd / Debbie Morrisey6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBarbara Gauthier / Kathleen Petro vs Leslie Zucker / Jeramie Gibson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWanda Grant / Linda Douglas vs Roxie Franks / Maxine Russack6-1, 6-3
2026-02-06vs Cherokee Bluff (Renee Bullard)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLory Tuholski / Robin Johnson vs Karen Miller / Debbie Culpepper1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEverely Lawrence / Gayle Bryan vs Kimberly Chastain / Bonnie Sikorski6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSue Stovall / Elaine Wood vs Renee Bullard / Patsy Kilmartin3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lifetime (Kendall Collier)*5114413125
2Smokerise (Julie Coleman)*5113516149
3Fowler Park (Kim Gillon)*4213511126
4Kennworth (Lori Cybulskis)*4212615133
5Holly Springs (Jennifer Trethaway)*4212616138
6Sandy Springs TC (Pay Rhyner)*4211716142
7USTA Atlanta/Mary Jane MacLeod4210818150
8Browns Farm (Bonnie Dye)*429920146
9Harrison (Victoria Necessary)*339921164
10Villages at Deaton Creek (Jane Buturff)*3381022159
11River Club (Dianne Wright)*3381022145
12Berkeley Hills CC (Wanda Bennewitz)*2461224171
13Huntcliff (Kathlyn Meyers)*0621633201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Everely Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Sue Stovall
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Gayle Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Barbara Gauthier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Wanda Grant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Elaine Wood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Kathy Merrill
published
2.87
Lory Tuholski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Janet Sadler-Akers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Kim Gillon
published
2.75
Kathleen Petro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Linda Douglas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nina Day
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lory Tuholski + Kathleen Petro5159% games+19.8% vs expected
Everely Lawrence + Kathy Merrill33566% games+9.2% vs expected
Everely Lawrence + Lory Tuholski6261% games+6.0% vs expected
Kathy Merrill + Lory Tuholski6064% games+3.9% vs expected
Wanda Grant + Elaine Wood11261% games+3.5% vs expected
Barbara Gauthier + Kathleen Petro16754% games+3.4% vs expected
Wanda Grant + Janet Sadler-Akers22558% games+1.5% vs expected
Kim Gillon + Wanda Grant18659% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Everely Lawrence
96W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Sue Stovall
83W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%43%
2.98
Gayle Bryan
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Barbara Gauthier
42W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Wanda Grant
80W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Elaine Wood
44W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kathy Merrill
82W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Lory Tuholski
60W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Janet Sadler-Akers
41W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Kim Gillon
58W–27L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Kathleen Petro
51W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Linda Douglas
18W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Nina Day
12W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.