Teams

Smokerise (Julie Coleman)*

USTA Atlanta Spring - 65 & Over Women · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-13vs Rockdale TC (Carolyn Redfearn)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesPatty Geltz / Julie Coleman vs Clarese Williams / Marian Pentheny4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Stahura / Beverley Dockeray Ojo vs Thomasine Parker / Carolyn Redfearn6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMarsha Kelley / Marylee Wooden vs Mary Etchison / Paisri Untachantr5-7, 6-7
2026-03-06vs Rhodes Jordan (Terry Aiello)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Troncalli / Mary Still vs Nan Lusins / Glennis Westbrook6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatty Geltz / Julie Coleman vs Terry Aiello / Pam Autrey7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Roberts / Marsha Kelley vs Laura Estep / Debbie Landress7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-04vs USTA Atlanta/Mary Jane MacLeodWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Still / Sharon Troncalli vs Wanda Loggins / Anne Haddox7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Coleman / Carolyn Carl vs Janet Pridgen / Nancy Willard3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Roberts / Beverley Dockeray Ojo vs Linda Dickerson / Diane McIntosh5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-02-20vs Rockdale TC (Carolyn Redfearn)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Troncalli / Mary Still vs Marian Pentheny / Jean Bell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Coleman / Carolyn Carl vs Betsy Roques / Clarese Williams6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBeverley Dockeray Ojo / Elaine Taylor vs Carolyn Redfearn / Linda Wittich6-0, 7-5
2026-02-13vs Rhodes Jordan (Terry Aiello)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Troncalli / Patty Geltz vs Nan Lusins / Rita Daniels6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Carl / Barbara Stahura vs Janet Stevens / Jan Hardwick6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElaine Taylor / Kathy Peters vs Laura Estep / Pam Autrey2-6, 6-7
2026-02-06vs USTA Atlanta/Mary Jane MacLeodLost 12
W#1 DoublesSharon Troncalli / Mary Still vs Anne Haddox / Suellen McRaney6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Stahura / Marsha Kelley vs Janet Pridgen / Nancy Willard0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Coyle / Elizabeth Roberts vs Linda Dickerson / Phyllis Dartt3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lifetime (Kendall Collier)*5114413125
2Smokerise (Julie Coleman)*5113516149
3Fowler Park (Kim Gillon)*4213511126
4Kennworth (Lori Cybulskis)*4212615133
5Holly Springs (Jennifer Trethaway)*4212616138
6Sandy Springs TC (Pay Rhyner)*4211716142
7USTA Atlanta/Mary Jane MacLeod4210818150
8Browns Farm (Bonnie Dye)*429920146
9Harrison (Victoria Necessary)*339921164
10Villages at Deaton Creek (Jane Buturff)*3381022159
11River Club (Dianne Wright)*3381022145
12Berkeley Hills CC (Wanda Bennewitz)*2461224171
13Huntcliff (Kathlyn Meyers)*0621633201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Julie Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Mary Still
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Beverley Dockeray Ojo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Sharon Troncalli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Carolyn Carl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Patty Geltz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Barbara Stahura
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Judy Coyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Marsha Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Lynne Felton
published
2.37
Kathy Peters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elaine Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marylee Wooden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Geltz + Julie Coleman3245% games−10.0% vs expected
Sharon Troncalli + Mary Still4162% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Stahura + Julie Coleman033 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Stahura + Lynne Felton033 matchesnot enough data
Marsha Kelley + Kathy Peters033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Coleman
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Mary Still
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Beverley Dockeray Ojo
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Sharon Troncalli
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Carolyn Carl
4W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Patty Geltz
16W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Barbara Stahura
5W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Judy Coyle
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Marsha Kelley
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
Lynne Felton
0W–8L career · no lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.41
Kathy Peters
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
Elaine Taylor
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marylee Wooden
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.