Teams

River Club (Dianne Wright)*

USTA Atlanta Spring - 65 & Over Women · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-20vs Sandy Springs TC (Pay Rhyner)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesClare Coyne / Sue Wiggin vs Susan Johnson / Pat Myers6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMayme Holcombe / Donna Barton vs Kim Oppenheimer / Klare McKee2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKandy Lowe / Dianne Wright vs Margaret Krengel / June Salaun2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesCarol Daubney / Cynthia Meadows vs Lynn Austin / Paula Smiley3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMichelle Liebergesell / Donna Barton vs Karen Comer / Karla Wright6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMayme Holcombe / Kandy Lowe vs Susan Engle / Janice Hansil6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-06vs Dunwoody North (Claire Botsch)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Liebergesell / Sue Wiggin vs Claire Botsch / Karen Grage1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDianne Wright / Ruth Dayman vs Laurie Demoff / Karen Dowdle5-7, 4-6
2026-03-04vs McGhee TC (Gladis Harris)*Split 11
W#1 DoublesClare Coyne / Carol Daubney vs Dorothy Johnson / P-Chez Martin6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Prescott / Dianne Wright vs Marilyn Robinson / Janice Pierce3-6, 2-6
2026-02-13vs Dekalb TC (Peggy Spencer)*Split 11
L#1 DoublesCarol Daubney / Sue Wiggin vs Kathy May / Judy Reid5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRuth Dayman / Cynthia Meadows vs Karen Hike / Susan Patterson6-0, 6-2
2026-02-06vs Lifetime (Kendall Collier)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesClare Coyne / Ruth Dayman vs Janet Feeley / Marian Lochry6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCynthia Meadows / Michelle Liebergesell vs Lucy Evans / Denise Brew3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKandy Lowe / Donna Barton vs Pamela Gross / Kimberly Jimenez1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lifetime (Kendall Collier)*5114413125
2Smokerise (Julie Coleman)*5113516149
3Fowler Park (Kim Gillon)*4213511126
4Kennworth (Lori Cybulskis)*4212615133
5Holly Springs (Jennifer Trethaway)*4212616138
6Sandy Springs TC (Pay Rhyner)*4211716142
7USTA Atlanta/Mary Jane MacLeod4210818150
8Browns Farm (Bonnie Dye)*429920146
9Harrison (Victoria Necessary)*339921164
10Villages at Deaton Creek (Jane Buturff)*3381022159
11River Club (Dianne Wright)*3381022145
12Berkeley Hills CC (Wanda Bennewitz)*2461224171
13Huntcliff (Kathlyn Meyers)*0621633201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Clare Coyne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Ruth Dayman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Sue Wiggin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Sarah Prescott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Cynthia Meadows
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Michelle Liebergesell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Florence Trego
published 2.5
2.54
Carol Daubney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Kandy Lowe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Mayme Holcombe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.43
Dianne Wright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.24
Donna Barton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clare Coyne + Cynthia Meadows3649% games+3.8% vs expected
Michelle Liebergesell + Cynthia Meadows4350% games−4.7% vs expected
Carol Daubney + Cynthia Meadows1644% games−12.6% vs expected
Clare Coyne + Ruth Dayman3256% gamesnot enough data
Clare Coyne + Carol Daubney134 matchesnot enough data
Florence Trego + Sarah Prescott123 matchesnot enough data
Mayme Holcombe + Donna Barton123 matchesnot enough data
Sue Wiggin + Ruth Dayman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Clare Coyne
18W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Ruth Dayman
32W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
Sue Wiggin
4W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Sarah Prescott
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Cynthia Meadows
13W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Michelle Liebergesell
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Florence Trego
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
3
Carol Daubney
15W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.54
Kandy Lowe
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Mayme Holcombe
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.44
3
Dianne Wright
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.43
2.5
Donna Barton
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.