USTA Atlanta/Mary Jane MacLeod
USTA Atlanta Spring - 65 & Over Women · 3.0
12 players · average NTRP 2.80 / GEORGIA
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule6 played
i
Flight standings13 teams · 3.0
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Lifetime (Kendall Collier)* | 5 | 1 | 13 | 125 |
| 2Smokerise (Julie Coleman)* | 5 | 1 | 16 | 149 |
| 3Fowler Park (Kim Gillon)* | 4 | 2 | 11 | 126 |
| 4Kennworth (Lori Cybulskis)* | 4 | 2 | 15 | 133 |
| 5Holly Springs (Jennifer Trethaway)* | 4 | 2 | 16 | 138 |
| 6Sandy Springs TC (Pay Rhyner)* | 4 | 2 | 16 | 142 |
| 7USTA Atlanta/Mary Jane MacLeod | 4 | 2 | 18 | 150 |
| 8Browns Farm (Bonnie Dye)* | 4 | 2 | 20 | 146 |
| 9Harrison (Victoria Necessary)* | 3 | 3 | 21 | 164 |
| 10Villages at Deaton Creek (Jane Buturff)* | 3 | 3 | 22 | 159 |
| 11River Club (Dianne Wright)* | 3 | 3 | 22 | 145 |
| 12Berkeley Hills CC (Wanda Bennewitz)* | 2 | 4 | 24 | 171 |
| 13Huntcliff (Kathlyn Meyers)* | 0 | 6 | 33 | 201 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Nancy Willard + Mary Jane MacLeod | 5–3 | 58% games | +24.4% vs expected |
| Nancy Willard + Janet Pridgen | 11–1 | 69% games | +14.8% vs expected |
| Mary Jane MacLeod + Wanda Loggins | 8–5 | 56% games | +13.0% vs expected |
| Suellen McRaney + Anne Haddox | 17–12 | 53% games | +4.8% vs expected |
| Anne Haddox + Wanda Loggins | 9–13 | 48% games | −2.1% vs expected |
| Diane McIntosh + April McKay | 4–7 | 47% games | −5.2% vs expected |
| Diane McIntosh + Cheryl Brussow | 2–13 | 32% games | −7.8% vs expected |
| Suellen McRaney + Mary Jane MacLeod | 1–11 | 39% games | −8.9% vs expected |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.