Teams

MC Labadia SSL A40-3.0W

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-04vs COE VanWieren SSL A40-3.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicolette Straley / Deborah Magers vs Susan Woods / Anne Witherill2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonica Fisher / Cindy Anderson vs Andree Almer / Kathy Shih6-3, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBelinda Best / Carrie Hewitt vs Marcia Bratschi-Gresens / Jill Mazzola2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-27vs MVH Kanis SSL A40-3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesDeborah Magers / Nicolette Straley vs Susan Griffith / Ann Radke4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMonica Fisher / Carrie Hewitt vs Mary Elling / Susan Green6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBelinda Best / Karen Noble vs Michelle Scripps / Alana Boonstra6-3, 6-2
2022-04-13vs MVS McDonald SSL A40-3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesMonica Fisher / Brandi Labadia vs Mary McMahon / Tracy Missad5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Anderson / Nicolette Straley vs Pam Tyler / Tara Herrington7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBelinda Best / Karen Noble vs Jill Gott-Gleason / Rosemary Heule6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-16vs MVS Vincent SSL A40-3.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrandi Labadia / Monica Fisher vs Michelle Seymour / Shar Kraal6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicolette Straley / Karen Noble vs Rachel Ogilvie / Christine Ferraiuolo-Dworak1-6, 3-6
2022-03-02vs WH Kamerling SSL A40-3.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica Fisher / Brandi Labadia vs ROSEANN BLAHNIK / Margaret Cancro4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicolette Straley / Nicki Traas vs Connie Kamerling / Pamela Hauer3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBelinda Best / Karen Noble vs Christie Schlegel / Joan VanSickler6-2, 6-2
2022-02-16vs PA Vis SSL A40-3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrandi Labadia / Cindy Anderson vs Patricia Lajoye / Deb Vis0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRhonda Moore / Nicolette Straley vs Dawn Hildebrand / Mary Pringle0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI SSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WH Kamerling SSL A40-3.0W5113514141
2MVS Vincent SSL A40-3.0W4211716136
3COE VanWieren SSL A40-3.0W429921170
4PA Vis SSL A40-3.0W339920145
5MC Labadia SSL A40-3.0W3381024173
6MVS McDonald SSL A40-3.0W2481021154
7MVH Kanis SSL A40-3.0W0641430205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Monica Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Cindy Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Deborah Magers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Carrie Hewitt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Brandi Labadia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Nicolette Straley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Belinda Best
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Karen Noble
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nicki Traas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rhonda Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicolette Straley + Belinda Best1545% games+6.1% vs expected
Belinda Best + Carrie Hewitt1447% games+4.8% vs expected
Nicolette Straley + Carrie Hewitt6754% games+1.6% vs expected
Nicolette Straley + Monica Fisher3348% games+0.8% vs expected
Brandi Labadia + Deborah Magers6848% games+0.3% vs expected
Cindy Anderson + Brandi Labadia3547% games−0.5% vs expected
Brandi Labadia + Nicolette Straley51343% games−1.5% vs expected
Karen Noble + Belinda Best51143% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Fisher
72W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Cindy Anderson
28W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Deborah Magers
32W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Carrie Hewitt
29W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Brandi Labadia
58W–132L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
Nicolette Straley
52W–102L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.61
2.5
Belinda Best
19W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.35
Karen Noble
23W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicki Traas
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Rhonda Moore
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.