Teams

MVS Vincent SSL A40-3.0W

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-11vs MVH Kanis SSL A40-3.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesRachel Ogilvie / Michelle Seymour vs Alana Boonstra / Ann Radke6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBarb Cribar / Shar Kraal vs Michelle Scripps / Susan Green6-0, 6-1
2022-04-27vs WH Kamerling SSL A40-3.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Vincent / Rachel Ogilvie vs Christine Mahaney / Stella Chivikas2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarb Cribar / Susan Richardson vs Pamela Hauer / Astrid Goldenbeld3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTammy Silk / Susan Kirkwood vs Ginger Owen / Gretchen Johnson6-7, 1-6
2022-03-30vs MVS McDonald SSL A40-3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesShar Kraal / Rachel Ogilvie vs Mia Helweg / Mary McMahon2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBarb Cribar / Susan Richardson vs Nancy McDonald / Tracy Missad6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly Kluting / Jean Gawlak-Suggs vs Rosemary Heule / Pam Tyler6-1, 6-2
2022-03-16vs MC Labadia SSL A40-3.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Seymour / Shar Kraal vs Brandi Labadia / Monica Fisher6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Ogilvie / Christine Ferraiuolo-Dworak vs Nicolette Straley / Karen Noble6-1, 6-3
2022-03-02vs PA Vis SSL A40-3.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Seymour / Shar Kraal vs Deb Vis / Patricia Lajoye6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Ferraiuolo-Dworak / Susan Richardson vs Sally Chandler / Mary Pringle6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Miller-Heys / Kelly Kluting vs Lynne Bass / Angie Portenga6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-16vs COE VanWieren SSL A40-3.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesShar Kraal / Rachel Ogilvie vs Andree Almer / Susan Alward6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKate Vincent / Barb Cribar vs Mary Bratschi-VanWieren / Kathy Shih6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristine Ferraiuolo-Dworak / Linda Miller-Heys vs Karen Klasing / Jill Mazzola4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI SSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WH Kamerling SSL A40-3.0W5113514141
2MVS Vincent SSL A40-3.0W4211716136
3COE VanWieren SSL A40-3.0W429921170
4PA Vis SSL A40-3.0W339920145
5MC Labadia SSL A40-3.0W3381024173
6MVS McDonald SSL A40-3.0W2481021154
7MVH Kanis SSL A40-3.0W0641430205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Rachel Ogilvie
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.29
Kate Vincent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Kelly Kluting
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Barb Cribar
usually #2 Doubles 89%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
2.97
Michelle Seymour
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Linda Miller-Heys
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Christine Ferraiuolo-Dworak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Evelyn Chung
published 3
2.71
Tammy Silk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Mandy Erway
published
Jean Gawlak-Suggs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shar Kraal
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Susan Kirkwood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Seymour + Kate Vincent7167% games+14.3% vs expected
Kate Vincent + Rachel Ogilvie26960% games+11.0% vs expected
Kate Vincent + Kelly Kluting5162% games+9.0% vs expected
Barb Cribar + Kate Vincent19958% games+6.2% vs expected
Christine Ferraiuolo-Dworak + Kelly Kluting4165% games+5.6% vs expected
Linda Miller-Heys + Kelly Kluting22757% games+3.6% vs expected
Tammy Silk + Susan Kirkwood7653% games+1.3% vs expected
Shar Kraal + Michelle Seymour7747% games−1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Ogilvie
81W–96L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Kate Vincent
154W–98L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Kelly Kluting
115W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%2%98%
3.27
3.5
Barb Cribar
104W–90L career · 9 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Michelle Seymour
60W–67L career · 3 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Linda Miller-Heys
75W–77L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Christine Ferraiuolo-Dworak
56W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Evelyn Chung
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tammy Silk
72W–56L career · 1 line in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Mandy Erway
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.49
Jean Gawlak-Suggs
14W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Shar Kraal
24W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Kirkwood
31W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.