Teams

MVH Kanis SSL A40-3.0W

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-24vs COE VanWieren SSL A40-3.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Elling / Ann Radke vs Andree Almer / Anne Witherill6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelli Hoeksema / Hope VandenTop vs Kimberly Wells / Marcia Bratschi-Gresens2-6, 0-6
2022-06-08vs WH Kamerling SSL A40-3.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Radke / Mary Elling vs Julie Benes / ROSEANN BLAHNIK4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTina Kanis / Hope VandenTop vs Astrid Goldenbeld / Pamela Hauer6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAlana Boonstra / Susan Green vs Ginger Owen / Joan VanSickler1-6, 0-6
2022-05-25vs PA Vis SSL A40-3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesTina Kanis / Susan Griffith vs Dawn Hildebrand / Mary Pringle6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Radke / Susan Green vs Angie Portenga / Susan Slater7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Elling / Hope VandenTop vs Sally Chandler / Nancy Krupp0-6, 2-6
2022-05-11vs MVS Vincent SSL A40-3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlana Boonstra / Ann Radke vs Rachel Ogilvie / Michelle Seymour3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichelle Scripps / Susan Green vs Barb Cribar / Shar Kraal0-6, 1-6
2022-04-27vs MC Labadia SSL A40-3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Griffith / Ann Radke vs Deborah Magers / Nicolette Straley6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Elling / Susan Green vs Monica Fisher / Carrie Hewitt4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Scripps / Alana Boonstra vs Belinda Best / Karen Noble3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI SSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WH Kamerling SSL A40-3.0W5113514141
2MVS Vincent SSL A40-3.0W4211716136
3COE VanWieren SSL A40-3.0W429921170
4PA Vis SSL A40-3.0W339920145
5MC Labadia SSL A40-3.0W3381024173
6MVS McDonald SSL A40-3.0W2481021154
7MVH Kanis SSL A40-3.0W0641430205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Ann Radke
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Susan Griffith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Tina Kanis
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
2.48
Hope VandenTop
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Alana Boonstra
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Kelli Hoeksema
published
Kristen Hagan
published
Mary Elling
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Michelle Scripps
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Krueger
published
Susan Green
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Griffith + Ann Radke3250% games−11.7% vs expected
Tina Kanis + Susan Griffith213 matchesnot enough data
Tina Kanis + Ann Radke123 matchesnot enough data
Tina Kanis + Hope VandenTop213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Radke
65W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.11
Susan Griffith
42W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
Tina Kanis
38W–65L career · 11 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Hope VandenTop
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Alana Boonstra
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelli Hoeksema
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristen Hagan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Elling
5W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Scripps
0W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Krueger
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Green
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.