Teams

COE VanWieren SSL A40-3.0W

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-24vs MVH Kanis SSL A40-3.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndree Almer / Anne Witherill vs Mary Elling / Ann Radke3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Wells / Marcia Bratschi-Gresens vs Kelli Hoeksema / Hope VandenTop6-2, 6-0
2022-05-04vs MC Labadia SSL A40-3.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Woods / Anne Witherill vs Nicolette Straley / Deborah Magers2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndree Almer / Kathy Shih vs Monica Fisher / Cindy Anderson3-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarcia Bratschi-Gresens / Jill Mazzola vs Belinda Best / Carrie Hewitt2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-27vs PA Vis SSL A40-3.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Shih / Kimberly Wells vs Tracy Sodini / Deb Vis1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Lange / Susan Woods vs Patricia Lajoye / Susan Slater1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMarcia Bratschi-Gresens / Andree Almer vs Angie Portenga / Lynne Bass6-1, 6-4
2022-04-13vs WH Kamerling SSL A40-3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Bratschi-VanWieren / Kimberly Wells vs Connie Kamerling / Julie Benes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarcia Bratschi-Gresens / Jill Mazzola vs Christine Mahaney / ROSEANN BLAHNIK1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndree Almer / Susan Woods vs Ginger Owen / Gretchen Johnson3-6, 2-6
2022-03-16vs MVS McDonald SSL A40-3.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Alward / Nancy Lange vs Mia Helweg / Mary McMahon7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarcia Bratschi-Gresens / Kimberly Wells vs Linda Thomason / Pam Tyler3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Klasing / Jill Mazzola vs Jill Gott-Gleason / Tara Herrington6-0, 6-4
2022-02-16vs MVS Vincent SSL A40-3.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndree Almer / Susan Alward vs Shar Kraal / Rachel Ogilvie4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Bratschi-VanWieren / Kathy Shih vs Kate Vincent / Barb Cribar3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Klasing / Jill Mazzola vs Christine Ferraiuolo-Dworak / Linda Miller-Heys6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI SSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WH Kamerling SSL A40-3.0W5113514141
2MVS Vincent SSL A40-3.0W4211716136
3COE VanWieren SSL A40-3.0W429921170
4PA Vis SSL A40-3.0W339920145
5MC Labadia SSL A40-3.0W3381024173
6MVS McDonald SSL A40-3.0W2481021154
7MVH Kanis SSL A40-3.0W0641430205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Susan Alward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Marcia Bratschi-Gresens
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Andree Almer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.71
Susan Woods
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Kathy Shih
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Jill Mazzola
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
Anne Witherill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Lisette Poletes
published
2.60
Nancy Lange
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Mary Bratschi-VanWieren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kimberly Wells
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Witherill + Mary Bratschi-VanWieren2843% games+8.3% vs expected
Nancy Lange + Susan Alward21856% games+3.9% vs expected
Kathy Shih + Mary Bratschi-VanWieren2349% games+2.4% vs expected
Marcia Bratschi-Gresens + Mary Bratschi-VanWieren61143% games−0.8% vs expected
Andree Almer + Jill Mazzola6651% games−1.2% vs expected
Nancy Lange + Anne Witherill5741% games−5.5% vs expected
Andree Almer + Kathy Shih2341% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Lange + Kathy Shih2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Alward
48W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
Marcia Bratschi-Gresens
31W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Andree Almer
29W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Woods
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Kathy Shih
22W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.67
Jill Mazzola
25W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Anne Witherill
20W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
2.61
Lisette Poletes
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Nancy Lange
43W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
2.60
Mary Bratschi-VanWieren
44W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
Kimberly Wells
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.