Teams

C 7.5W MV Robson

2022 NEOTA Combo Fall · NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall

20 players · average NTRP 3.55 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-12vs C 7.5W WR DaberkoWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Cipriani / Chipo Jolibois vs Courtney Foster / Christine Davis6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTasha Mixon / Elyse Gustafson vs Kelle DeBoth / Allison Sency1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDebora Bork / Erica Wigton vs Marcia Roberts / Kathy Rinicella2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-11-06vs C 7.5W MM WrightLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Zucca / Chipo Jolibois vs Rachel Wright / Elizabeth Caldera4-6, 2-5
L#2 DoublesErica Wigton / Diane Roberto vs Deanne Gibson / Laura Hyres4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJaneen Miklowski / Holly Vilsack vs Tara Limestoll / Emily Szymanski5-7, 6-7
2022-10-30vs C 7.5W WE FennerLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Miluk / Pamela Zalba vs Lindsay Lodge / Kristin Schron2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmy Zucca / Deborah O'Shaughnessy vs Rini Garber / Andrea Ayyappan7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLauren Smith / Tasha Mixon vs Virginia McClure / Rebecca Alexander6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-15vs C 7.5W AVB HendricksLost 02
L#1 DoublesHolly Vilsack / Janeen Miklowski vs Dina Hopps / Pamela Steinhauser6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristin Chuko / Yulia Lyublinski vs Joan Kerosky / Camilla Hill7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-09vs C 7.5W AVB HendricksLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Zucca / Chipo Jolibois vs Lori Digiacomo / Carla Elenz6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Cipriani / Eileen Connell vs Camilla Hill / Kasey Bland7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristin Chuko / Judith Robson vs Megan Bryan / Shermeen Farukhi3-6, 1-6
2022-10-09vs C 7.5W WR DaberkoLost 03
L#1 DoublesYulia Lyublinski / Elyse Gustafson vs Caterina Petty / Lori Goosmann6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErica Wigton / Kate Bishop vs Beth Schwartz / Courtney Foster0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Miluk / Melissa Grannum vs Kathleen Daberko / Allison Sency2-6, 0-6
2022-10-02vs C 7.5W MM WrightLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Roberto / Michelle Miluk vs Deanne Gibson / Marybeth Esposito7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJaneen Miklowski / Deborah O'Shaughnessy vs Natalia Rosca / Susan Kim1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Zucca / Lauren Smith vs Tara Limestoll / Emily Szymanski2-6, 4-6
2022-09-25vs C 7.5W WE FennerLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Miluk / Diane Roberto vs Abigail Daroff / Elizabeth Ries7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJaneen Miklowski / Debora Bork vs Kortney Scully / Alison Lee6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Cipriani / Judith Robson vs Rini Garber / Kelley Clegg4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W MM Wright7117715195
2C 7.5W NR2 Wissman7118616180
3C 7.5W NR1 Bartram6216819183
4C 7.5W WE Fenner6215920212
5C 7.5W PW1 Atkinson5315921186
6C 7.5W SP Gray53121229232
7C 7.5W AVB Hendricks44131126205
8C 7.5W WR Daberko2681634237
9C 7.5W MV Robson1771735242
10C 7.5W PW3 DeWerth1761839254
11C 7.5W PW2 Cicero1751941261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Michelle Miluk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Janeen Miklowski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Donna Rondini
published 4
3.67
Amy Zucca
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Erica Wigton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Kristin Chuko
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Karen Cipriani
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Pamela Zalba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Yulia Lyublinski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Eileen Connell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Chipo Jolibois
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Deborah O'Shaughnessy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Holly Vilsack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Diane Roberto
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Tasha Mixon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Elyse Gustafson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.65
Judith Robson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Debora Bork
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Kate Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Melissa Grannum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah O'Shaughnessy + Amy Zucca6165% games+14.3% vs expected
Michelle Miluk + Karen Cipriani6071% games+13.4% vs expected
Pamela Zalba + Kristin Chuko10357% games+6.7% vs expected
Elyse Gustafson + Eileen Connell5066% games+6.4% vs expected
Diane Roberto + Kristin Chuko6551% games+5.5% vs expected
Elyse Gustafson + Kristin Chuko12855% games+3.8% vs expected
Pamela Zalba + Yulia Lyublinski311358% games+3.4% vs expected
Eileen Connell + Kate Bishop5451% games+2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Miluk
133W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Janeen Miklowski
77W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Donna Rondini
94W–78L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Amy Zucca
82W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Erica Wigton
45W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
Kristin Chuko
215W–144L career · 3 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Karen Cipriani
86W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
Pamela Zalba
149W–136L career · 3 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
Yulia Lyublinski
131W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Eileen Connell
176W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Chipo Jolibois
85W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Deborah O'Shaughnessy
109W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Holly Vilsack
79W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Diane Roberto
49W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Tasha Mixon
44W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Elyse Gustafson
103W–128L career · 4 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.93
Judith Robson
49W–69L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Debora Bork
73W–99L career · 5 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.42
Kate Bishop
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Grannum
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.