Teams

C 7.5W PW1 Atkinson

2022 NEOTA Combo Fall · NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall

17 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-20vs C 7.5W PW2 CiceroSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Dennie / Analia Dimit vs Theresa Smith / Lisa Ott6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Kmiecik / Jennifer Castelluccio vs Meryl Reams / Susan McIntyre6-1, 6-2
2022-11-06vs C 7.5W NR2 WissmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Lanigan / Megan Kelly vs Stacey Varuolo / Erin Hubbard6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDebora Ksenich / Gail Schneider vs Dace Zemzars / Lisa Wissman7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlison Boeckman / Sara Verespej vs Mary Heideloff / Amy Koziara6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-30vs C 7.5W NR1 BartramWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlison Boeckman / Sara Verespej vs Annette Lipaj / Jean Harsar6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Atkinson / Rochelle Sladek vs Julia Bartram / Amy Grace6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathleen Kmiecik / Nicole Mikolich vs Irene Slattery / Julie Kelly6-3, 6-0
2022-10-21vs C 7.5W PW3 DeWerthWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlison Boeckman / Sara Verespej vs Jeanne MacKay / Erica Chiricosta6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Lanigan / Amanda de Leon vs Diana Lindblom / Katherine Reid7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Dennie / Analia Dimit vs Nancy Koehler / Cindy Malixi6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-16vs C 7.5W PW2 CiceroWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebora Ksenich / Gail Schneider vs Katie Orr / Lisa Ott6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathleen Kmiecik / Nicole Mikolich vs Angela Cicero / Stacey Gonzalez6-4, 6-3
2022-10-07vs C 7.5W NR2 WissmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebora Ksenich / Gail Schneider vs Kathleen Weiss / Mary Goetz2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda de Leon / Karen Lanigan vs Stacey Varuolo / Pam Stepnick3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Dennie / Analia Dimit vs Lisa Wissman / Dace Zemzars3-6, 5-7
2022-09-25vs C 7.5W NR1 BartramLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlison Boeckman / Sara Verespej vs Yue Bruckner / Margaret Trombetta7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Kmiecik / Megan Kelly vs Kathleen Craig / Jean Harsar6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSheryl Martin / Jennifer Castelluccio vs Margaret VanDine / Allison Evans1-6, 3-6
2022-09-18vs C 7.5W PW3 DeWerthWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebora Ksenich / Nicole Mikolich vs Kate Began / Erica Chiricosta6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Lanigan / Analia Dimit vs Ann Dewerth / Katherine Reid6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDiane Purcell / Rochelle Sladek vs Jeanne MacKay / Diana Lindblom7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W MM Wright7117715195
2C 7.5W NR2 Wissman7118616180
3C 7.5W NR1 Bartram6216819183
4C 7.5W WE Fenner6215920212
5C 7.5W PW1 Atkinson5315921186
6C 7.5W SP Gray53121229232
7C 7.5W AVB Hendricks44131126205
8C 7.5W WR Daberko2681634237
9C 7.5W MV Robson1771735242
10C 7.5W PW3 DeWerth1761839254
11C 7.5W PW2 Cicero1751941261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Debora Ksenich
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Jennifer Castelluccio
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.56
Alison Boeckman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Kathleen Kmiecik
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Nicole Mikolich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Sara Verespej
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Jennifer Atkinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Amanda de Leon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Diane Purcell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Gail Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Karen Lanigan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Analia Dimit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Emily Dennie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Megan Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Manco
published
Rochelle Sladek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sheryl Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Mikolich + Debora Ksenich10560% games+7.4% vs expected
Nicole Mikolich + Sara Verespej14561% games+6.2% vs expected
Gail Schneider + Debora Ksenich6257% games+5.4% vs expected
Amanda de Leon + Alison Boeckman2354% games+3.4% vs expected
Alison Boeckman + Debora Ksenich3549% games+2.7% vs expected
Diane Purcell + Jennifer Atkinson212650% games+1.8% vs expected
Alison Boeckman + Jennifer Atkinson4650% games+0.8% vs expected
Karen Lanigan + Jennifer Atkinson8848% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debora Ksenich
124W–108L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jennifer Castelluccio
65W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Alison Boeckman
56W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Kathleen Kmiecik
85W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Nicole Mikolich
108W–87L career · 4 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
Sara Verespej
97W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
Jennifer Atkinson
121W–105L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Amanda de Leon
79W–72L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Diane Purcell
28W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Gail Schneider
33W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Lanigan
94W–96L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Analia Dimit
41W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Emily Dennie
44W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
Megan Kelly
36W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Manco
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rochelle Sladek
15W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheryl Martin
30W–31L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.