Teams

C 7.5W MM Wright

2022 NEOTA Combo Fall · NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-13vs C 7.5W WE FennerLost 02
L#1 DoublesNikki Mercer / Elizabeth Caldera vs Katie Allan / Jillian Fetzner4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTara Limestoll / Emily Szymanski vs Stacy Casamento / Alison Lee4-6, 4-6
2022-11-06vs C 7.5W MV RobsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Wright / Elizabeth Caldera vs Amy Zucca / Chipo Jolibois6-4, 5-2
W#2 DoublesDeanne Gibson / Laura Hyres vs Erica Wigton / Diane Roberto6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTara Limestoll / Emily Szymanski vs Janeen Miklowski / Holly Vilsack7-5, 7-6
2022-10-29vs C 7.5W AVB HendricksWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalia Rosca / Patricia Mercuri vs Dina Hopps / Pamela Steinhauser7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeanne Gibson / Kathleen Aranavage vs Megan Bryan / Shannon Tareshawty6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Vinborg / Laura Hyres vs Kasey Bland / Susan Aey4-6, 0-6
2022-10-22vs C 7.5W WR DaberkoWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalia Rosca / Elizabeth Caldera vs Angela Lewis / Mina Choi6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Wright / Michelle Frederick vs Courtney Foster / Beth Jokhio3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesPatricia Mercuri / Susan Vinborg vs Allison Sency / Christine Davis6-3, 6-3
2022-10-09vs C 7.5W WE FennerWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalia Rosca / Nikki Mercer vs Maureen Brichmann / Elizabeth Ries6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeanne Gibson / Kathleen Aranavage vs Tiffany Fenner / Elaine Niehenke7-5, 6-3
2022-10-02vs C 7.5W MV RobsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesDeanne Gibson / Marybeth Esposito vs Diane Roberto / Michelle Miluk5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNatalia Rosca / Susan Kim vs Janeen Miklowski / Deborah O'Shaughnessy6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTara Limestoll / Emily Szymanski vs Amy Zucca / Lauren Smith6-2, 6-4
2022-09-25vs C 7.5W AVB HendricksWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Caldera / Nikki Mercer vs Kasey Bland / Dina Hopps7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRachel Wright / Michelle Frederick vs Carla Elenz / Courtnie Higgins6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Vinborg / Patricia Mercuri vs Joan Kerosky / Meredythe McNally1-6, 6-7
2022-09-18vs C 7.5W WR DaberkoWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalia Rosca / Elizabeth Caldera vs Arminda Parker / Angela Lewis1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Wright / Jan Kolesar vs Allison Sency / Christine Davis6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Vinborg / Kathleen Aranavage vs Kathleen Daberko / Lori Goosmann6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W MM Wright7117715195
2C 7.5W NR2 Wissman7118616180
3C 7.5W NR1 Bartram6216819183
4C 7.5W WE Fenner6215920212
5C 7.5W PW1 Atkinson5315921186
6C 7.5W SP Gray53121229232
7C 7.5W AVB Hendricks44131126205
8C 7.5W WR Daberko2681634237
9C 7.5W MV Robson1771735242
10C 7.5W PW3 DeWerth1761839254
11C 7.5W PW2 Cicero1751941261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Deanne Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Tara Limestoll
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Kathleen Aranavage
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Susan Vinborg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Patricia Mercuri
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Jan Kolesar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Caldera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Laura Hyres
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Emily Szymanski
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Michelle Frederick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Marybeth Esposito
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Natalia Rosca
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Nikki Mercer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Mercuri + Kathleen Aranavage15762% games+10.6% vs expected
Kathleen Aranavage + Jan Kolesar11266% games+6.8% vs expected
Emily Szymanski + Tara Limestoll231157% games+3.5% vs expected
Patricia Mercuri + Marybeth Esposito6163% games+2.5% vs expected
Patricia Mercuri + Jan Kolesar16658% games+1.9% vs expected
Deanne Gibson + Patricia Mercuri4253% games−1.8% vs expected
Susan Vinborg + Kathleen Aranavage2840% games−2.1% vs expected
Michelle Frederick + Patricia Mercuri7651% games−4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deanne Gibson
102W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
Tara Limestoll
70W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Kathleen Aranavage
147W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Susan Vinborg
43W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
3.33
Patricia Mercuri
171W–118L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Jan Kolesar
140W–68L career · 1 line in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Elizabeth Caldera
64W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Hyres
73W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Emily Szymanski
92W–75L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Michelle Frederick
79W–99L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Marybeth Esposito
115W–74L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Natalia Rosca
31W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nikki Mercer
42W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.