Teams

C 7.5W WE Fenner

2022 NEOTA Combo Fall · NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall

24 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-20vs C 7.5W WR DaberkoWon 30
W#1 DoublesMonique Sacks / Jillian Fetzner vs Beth Jokhio / Angela Lewis6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristin Schron / Lindsay Lodge vs Kathleen Daberko / Allison Sency6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTiffany Fenner / Nadia Wearsch vs Beth Schwartz / Caterina Petty6-2, 6-4
2022-11-13vs C 7.5W MM WrightWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Allan / Jillian Fetzner vs Nikki Mercer / Elizabeth Caldera6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStacy Casamento / Alison Lee vs Tara Limestoll / Emily Szymanski6-4, 6-4
2022-10-30vs C 7.5W MV RobsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsay Lodge / Kristin Schron vs Michelle Miluk / Pamela Zalba6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRini Garber / Andrea Ayyappan vs Amy Zucca / Deborah O'Shaughnessy5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesVirginia McClure / Rebecca Alexander vs Lauren Smith / Tasha Mixon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-30vs C 7.5W WR DaberkoWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaureen Brichmann / Kelley Clegg vs Kari Gillen / Andrea Wangenheim6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMonique Sacks / Jillian Fetzner vs Angela Lewis / Lynn Krapf6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Nelson / Shannan Holodinski vs Allison Sency / Susan Oldham6-4, 6-1
2022-10-22vs C 7.5W AVB HendricksLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsay Lodge / Katie Allan vs Megan Bryan / Shermeen Farukhi5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAbigail Daroff / Kelley Clegg vs Dina Hopps / Pamela Steinhauser3-6, 5-7
2022-10-09vs C 7.5W MM WrightLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaureen Brichmann / Elizabeth Ries vs Natalia Rosca / Nikki Mercer3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Fenner / Elaine Niehenke vs Deanne Gibson / Kathleen Aranavage5-7, 3-6
2022-09-25vs C 7.5W MV RobsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesAbigail Daroff / Elizabeth Ries vs Michelle Miluk / Diane Roberto5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKortney Scully / Alison Lee vs Janeen Miklowski / Debora Bork7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRini Garber / Kelley Clegg vs Karen Cipriani / Judith Robson6-4, 6-1
2022-09-18vs C 7.5W AVB HendricksWon 21
W#1 DoublesErica Richardson / Nadia Wearsch vs Susan Aey / Dina Hopps6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStacy Casamento / Elaine Niehenke vs Hannah Morrison / Joan Kerosky2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Nelson / Shannan Holodinski vs Bianca Collins / Carla Elenz6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W MM Wright7117715195
2C 7.5W NR2 Wissman7118616180
3C 7.5W NR1 Bartram6216819183
4C 7.5W WE Fenner6215920212
5C 7.5W PW1 Atkinson5315921186
6C 7.5W SP Gray53121229232
7C 7.5W AVB Hendricks44131126205
8C 7.5W WR Daberko2681634237
9C 7.5W MV Robson1771735242
10C 7.5W PW3 DeWerth1761839254
11C 7.5W PW2 Cicero1751941261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Elizabeth Ries
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.82
Kristin Schron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Erica Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Kortney Scully
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Abigail Daroff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Martha Meyer
published
3.54
Tiffany Fenner
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.50
Virginia McClure
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Rini Garber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Jillian Fetzner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.37
Elaine Niehenke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Kelley Clegg
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Amy Burtnett
published 3.5
Andrea Ayyappan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Anna Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Lindsay Lodge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Alison Lee
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.94
Shannan Holodinski
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Katie Allan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maureen Brichmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Monique Sacks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nadia Wearsch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Rebecca Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Stacy Casamento
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Ries + Jillian Fetzner6167% games+15.9% vs expected
Andrea Ayyappan + Kelley Clegg6073% games+14.3% vs expected
Rebecca Alexander + Kelley Clegg8167% games+13.5% vs expected
Elaine Niehenke + Jillian Fetzner15267% games+11.7% vs expected
Lindsay Lodge + Jillian Fetzner9457% games+9.7% vs expected
Elaine Niehenke + Kelley Clegg11262% games+9.1% vs expected
Alison Lee + Lindsay Lodge4356% games+8.9% vs expected
Erica Richardson + Martha Meyer7064% games+7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Ries
104W–36L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
Kristin Schron
39W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.82
4
Erica Richardson
115W–61L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Kortney Scully
36W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Abigail Daroff
81W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Meyer
36W–19L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Tiffany Fenner
71W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Virginia McClure
56W–40L career · 1 line in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
Rini Garber
43W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.46
Jillian Fetzner
100W–37L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Elaine Niehenke
132W–81L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Kelley Clegg
148W–51L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Amy Burtnett
47W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Ayyappan
82W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anna Nelson
32W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindsay Lodge
112W–89L career · 12 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Alison Lee
112W–94L career · 7 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.00
Shannan Holodinski
85W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
Katie Allan
58W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Brichmann
33W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Monique Sacks
32W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nadia Wearsch
52W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Alexander
64W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacy Casamento
94W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.