Teams

CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M River Trails Ciuca Sat 6 $20

CDTA ESL 40 & Over W · E

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Porto / Jawad Hussain vs Eric Gordon / Kaz Walczak6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRenato di Sandro vs Roberto Durango6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAdrian Ciuca / Bill Johnston vs Brian Yoo / Brian Toba6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesZeno Popa / Jawad Hussain vs Paul Leonardo / Mark Fessler3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Hong vs Joon Sung2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesZeno Popa / Andreas Eckstein vs Mark Fessler / Isaac Kim6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBill Johnston / Ken Sitar vs Young Choi / Brian Toba6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAdrian Ciuca / Zeno Popa vs Curtis Baddeley / Barry Marks6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Hong / Renato di Sandro vs Mark Juhl / Dan Kepler7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJawad Hussain / Abbas Kanji vs Cliff Breslow / Alex Paz6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBill Johnston / Ken Sitar vs Rick Aguayo / Robert Bieniek6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Hong / Brett Wangman vs Steve Franks / Joseph Lyden6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBill Johnston / Ken Sitar vs Bob Schnoll / Paul Zuffa7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAdrian Ciuca / Zeno Popa vs Guy Jang / Brian Bessler6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAndy Kidwell vs Oscar Moncau6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Hong / Brett Wangman vs Eric Gordon / Kaz Walczak5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Centennial Franks Fri 7:30 $2091261433288
2CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M River Trails Ciuca Sat 6 $2073241636273
3CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Centre Court Hanford Sun 12 $2064241640313
4CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Glenview Sung Sat 2 $2325161229234
5CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M MT Bann Smith Sun 12 $252692350311
6(DROPPED) CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Wheaton Keyes Sat 2 $17000000
7CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Naperville Podwika Sun 4:30 $200752347301

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Adrian Ciuca
published 4
3.75
Brett Wangman
published 4
Andreas Eckstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bill Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Zeno Popa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.69
Andy Kidwell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.62
Michael Hong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.55
Gregory Adams
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.39
Jeffrey Porto
published 3.5
Eric Lussow
published 3.5
Jason Heine
published
Jawad Hussain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ken Sitar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Renato di Sandro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Wangman + Zeno Popa8458% games+3.9% vs expected
Adrian Ciuca + Zeno Popa271555% games+1.5% vs expected
Gregory Adams + Brett Wangman8845% games−4.8% vs expected
Michael Hong + Brett Wangman6747% games−7.9% vs expected
Brett Wangman + Adrian Ciuca91249% games−20.3% vs expected
Adrian Ciuca + Eric Lussow11454% gamesnot enough data
Bill Johnston + Adrian Ciuca6251% gamesnot enough data
Michael Hong + Jeffrey Porto4454% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adrian Ciuca
263W–157L career · no lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
4.07
4
Brett Wangman
118W–100L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Andreas Eckstein
25W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Bill Johnston
30W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Zeno Popa
59W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Andy Kidwell
61W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Michael Hong
126W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.62
4
Gregory Adams
29W–60L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Jeffrey Porto
135W–109L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Eric Lussow
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jason Heine
9W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jawad Hussain
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ken Sitar
96W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Renato di Sandro
31W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.