Teams

CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Naperville Podwika Sun 4:30 $20

CDTA ESL 40 & Over W · E

12 players · average NTRP 3.81 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesJohn Gatz / Scott Modica vs Gregory Adams / Brett Wangman3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Centennial Franks Fri 7:30 $2091261433288
2CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M River Trails Ciuca Sat 6 $2073241636273
3CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Centre Court Hanford Sun 12 $2064241640313
4CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Glenview Sung Sat 2 $2325161229234
5CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M MT Bann Smith Sun 12 $252692350311
6(DROPPED) CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Wheaton Keyes Sat 2 $17000000
7CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Naperville Podwika Sun 4:30 $200752347301

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
John Gatz
published 4
3.78
Bruce Thornquist
published 4
3.75
Kevin Podwika
published 4
3.72
Patrick Seermon
published 4
3.62
ADITYA OBI
published 4
3.58
Gregg Cook
published 4
3.36
Ira Lathan
published 3.5
2.76
Eric Esancy
published 3
Joseph Zabat
published
Ken Comey
published
Scott Modica
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Gatz + Scott Modica372754% games+0.9% vs expected
Kevin Podwika + Bruce Thornquist171154% games+0.4% vs expected
Kevin Podwika + John Gatz6654% games−0.3% vs expected
Patrick Seermon + John Gatz11463% games−0.6% vs expected
Scott Modica + Bruce Thornquist10258% games−4.3% vs expected
John Gatz + Bruce Thornquist7354% games−4.4% vs expected
Gregg Cook + John Gatz2640% games−17.2% vs expected
Kevin Podwika + Scott Modica11554% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
John Gatz
163W–118L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Bruce Thornquist
238W–98L career · type A · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Kevin Podwika
361W–203L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Patrick Seermon
116W–61L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
ADITYA OBI
59W–43L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Gregg Cook
24W–27L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Ira Lathan
34W–65L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3
Eric Esancy
154W–187L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Joseph Zabat
67W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ken Comey
48W–39L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nils Stefan Pettersson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Modica
110W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.