Teams

CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Centennial Franks Fri 7:30 $20

CDTA ESL 40 & Over W · E

18 players · average NTRP 3.94 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesDanny Postel / Christopher Darnielle vs Joon Sung / SEAN YANG3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRafael Lozada / David Chopp vs Brian Yoo / Tom Conradi3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRick Aguayo vs Felix Danciu3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Chopp / Mark Harlan vs Mark Juhl / Dan Kepler1-6, 2-3
2021-10-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Chopp / Mark Harlan vs Mark Fessler / Eric Yu5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDavid Chopp / Paul Zuffa vs Adrian Ciuca / Gregory Adams7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRick Aguayo / Robert Bieniek vs Bill Johnston / Ken Sitar2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Franks / Joseph Lyden vs Michael Hong / Brett Wangman4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBob Schnoll / Paul Zuffa vs Bill Johnston / Ken Sitar6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Centennial Franks Fri 7:30 $2091261433288
2CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M River Trails Ciuca Sat 6 $2073241636273
3CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Centre Court Hanford Sun 12 $2064241640313
4CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Glenview Sung Sat 2 $2325161229234
5CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M MT Bann Smith Sun 12 $252692350311
6(DROPPED) CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Wheaton Keyes Sat 2 $17000000
7CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Naperville Podwika Sun 4:30 $200752347301

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Rafael Lozada
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Jay Freedman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
David Chopp
published 4
Christopher Darnielle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Hugo VanderGoes
published 4
3.72
Rick Aguayo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.71
Eric Haab
published 4
3.67
Danny Postel
published 4
3.55
Bob Schnoll
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Sameer Talcherkar
published
3.36
Steve Franks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Joseph Lyden
published 3.5
Mark Harlan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Marijanovic
published
Paul Zuffa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Randy Curtis
published
Stan Terry
published
Steven Schenker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Chopp + Rafael Lozada12660% games+11.7% vs expected
Paul Zuffa + Bob Schnoll5553% games+0.2% vs expected
Bob Schnoll + Rick Aguayo5250% games−4.8% vs expected
Randy Curtis + Jay Freedman10459% gamesnot enough data
David Chopp + Mark Harlan2847% gamesnot enough data
Paul Zuffa + David Chopp5259% gamesnot enough data
Paul Zuffa + Rick Aguayo2549% gamesnot enough data
Steven Schenker + Stan Terry2546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rafael Lozada
223W–106L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.03
Jay Freedman
92W–63L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
David Chopp
148W–121L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christopher Darnielle
43W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Hugo VanderGoes
66W–79L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Rick Aguayo
124W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Eric Haab
12W–21L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Danny Postel
63W–66L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Bob Schnoll
28W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Sameer Talcherkar
14W–45L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Steve Franks
42W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Joseph Lyden
66W–115L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Mark Harlan
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Marijanovic
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Zuffa
44W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Randy Curtis
65W–41L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stan Terry
16W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Schenker
28W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.