Teams

CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M MT Bann Smith Sun 12 $25

CDTA ESL 40 & Over W · E

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 SinglesFelix Danciu vs Rick Aguayo6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Juhl / Dan Kepler vs David Chopp / Mark Harlan6-1, 3-2
W#1 DoublesCurtis Baddeley / Barry Marks vs Adrian Ciuca / Zeno Popa1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnthony Fiordaliso vs Jeffrey Porto3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Juhl / Dan Kepler vs Michael Hong / Renato di Sandro6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCliff Breslow / Alex Paz vs Jawad Hussain / Abbas Kanji0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Centennial Franks Fri 7:30 $2091261433288
2CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M River Trails Ciuca Sat 6 $2073241636273
3CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Centre Court Hanford Sun 12 $2064241640313
4CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Glenview Sung Sat 2 $2325161229234
5CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M MT Bann Smith Sun 12 $252692350311
6(DROPPED) CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Wheaton Keyes Sat 2 $17000000
7CDTA E 40&O W/E 4.0M Naperville Podwika Sun 4:30 $200752347301

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Felix Danciu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Allen Goodman
published 4
Curtis Baddeley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Barry Marks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Anthony Fiordaliso
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.45
Cliff Breslow
published 3.5
3.42
Paul Leyderman
published 3.5
3.40
Mark Juhl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Howard Braun
published 3.5
Alex Paz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Steve Mesirow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Strickley + Howard Braun2849% games−1.8% vs expected
Cliff Breslow + Alex Paz4441% gamesnot enough data
Alex Paz + Howard Braun044 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Fiordaliso + Curtis Baddeley044 matchesnot enough data
Paul Leyderman + Howard Braun044 matchesnot enough data
Cliff Breslow + Howard Braun033 matchesnot enough data
Mark Juhl + Curtis Baddeley123 matchesnot enough data
Mark Juhl + Steve Mesirow033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Felix Danciu
36W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Allen Goodman
15W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Curtis Baddeley
31W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Barry Marks
35W–31L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Anthony Fiordaliso
16W–26L career · 1 line in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cliff Breslow
43W–39L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Paul Leyderman
151W–147L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Mark Juhl
24W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Howard Braun
60W–96L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Alex Paz
20W–43L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
William Strickley
116W–134L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
Steve Mesirow
7W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.