Teams

IE-VMHS-Joanne Harned

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.64 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-26vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterWon 10
W#1 DoublesApril Mays / Darla Gonzalez vs Ellen Yarter / Jill Mastroluca6-4, 7-6
2022-03-06vs IE-LLW-CL-Andrea BohnSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJennifer Budzak vs Wendy Williams6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNath Sayasane / Tessie Rivera vs Erin Furlong / Sheila Walkington6-3, 7-6
2022-02-05vs IE-CCCC-Sesilie/AmyWon 30
W#1 DoublesTessie Rivera / Karin Ward vs Amy Garrett / Sesilie Kay6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Budzak vs Kelly Barhorst6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDarla Gonzalez / Joanne Harned vs Amy Taylor / Shelley Mellentine6-3, 6-4
2022-01-29vs IE-MVHS-Elvira SchlangerLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarla Gonzalez / Joanne Harned vs Elvira Schlanger / Michele Lawrence2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesApril Mays vs Charanya Sivaraman0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTessie Rivera / Sheila Forgerson vs Lorette Oliver / Toni McAllister6-3, 6-1
2022-01-23vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 01
L#1 SinglesApril Mays vs Mary Ann Neder3-6, 1-6
2022-01-09vs IE-APTC-Ruby VillanuevaLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanie Thacker / Joanne Harned vs Terrie Garcia / Nanette Pratini2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Karin Ward
published 4
Briana Masters
published 4
3.33
Jennifer Budzak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
April Mays
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Joanne Harned
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Darla Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.13
Jeanie Thacker
published
3.10
Nath Sayasane
published
3.06
Tessie Rivera
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Harned + Tessie Rivera8955% games+5.2% vs expected
Joanne Harned + Darla Gonzalez3247% games−6.2% vs expected
Joanne Harned + April Mays7256% gamesnot enough data
Tessie Rivera + April Mays3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karin Ward
72W–54L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Briana Masters
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jennifer Budzak
47W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
April Mays
47W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Joanne Harned
52W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Darla Gonzalez
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Jeanie Thacker
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
Nath Sayasane
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Tessie Rivera
92W–111L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.