Teams

IE-TCC-Ellen Yarter

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2022-03-26vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandLost 02
L#1 DoublesEllen Yarter / Trish Newlin vs Ronda Smyth / Elvia Quintana7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKerri Munson vs Holly Birdsell1-6, 1-6
2022-03-26vs IE-VMHS-Joanne HarnedLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Yarter / Jill Mastroluca vs April Mays / Darla Gonzalez4-6, 6-7
2022-03-20vs IE-CCCC-Sesilie/AmyLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaurel Eriksen / Marie Honda vs Amy Taylor / Amy Garrett6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKerri Munson vs Danika Egizi2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJill Mastroluca / Mara Watkins vs Annette Flores / Sara Aschmann1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-13vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 12
L#1 DoublesEllen Yarter / Shaheen Plunier vs Jeanne Shelter / Maureen Duncan4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCharlotte Pereira Reisch vs Rebecca Cloyd3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Kronseder / Anne Neal vs Tara MacHarg / Michelle Dempsey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-13vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandLost 01
L#2 DoublesEllen Yarter / Sheila Purdy vs Keiko Dodge / Jeananne Woodman1-6, 0-6
2022-03-07vs IE-MVHS-Elvira SchlangerLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Mastroluca / Linda Kronseder vs Charanya Sivaraman / Silvia Vich0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesCharlotte Pereira Reisch vs Toni McAllister6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarie Honda / Kitty Myers vs Elvira Schlanger / Michele Lawrence0-6, 2-6
2022-03-06vs IE-CCCC-Sharon HebertLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Yarter / Allison Smith vs Theresa Winterburn / Kathalena Cocker2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-02-20vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Miller / Kerri Munson vs Rebecca Cloyd / Joan Greene6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-02-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Miller / Ellen Yarter vs Jully Martilla / Jennifer Richards4-6, 1-6
2022-02-06vs IE-APTC-Ruby VillanuevaWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurel Eriksen / Ellen Yarter vs Tracy DuPrez / Judy Wade6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKerri Munson vs Jannah Carrasco6-4, 6-4
2022-01-30vs IE-LLW-CL-Andrea BohnLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarie Honda / Anne Neal vs Andrea Bohn / Rhonda Arendt2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCharlotte Pereira Reisch vs Rhianna Thompson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJill Mastroluca / Kerri Munson vs Tammy Kennedy / Erin Furlong7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-29vs IE-CCCC-Sharon HebertLost 01
L#2 DoublesEllen Yarter / Kerri Munson vs Whitney Johnson / Theresa Winterburn3-6, 0-6
2022-01-09vs IE-LLW-VMHS-Josie HendrixLost 01
L#2 DoublesShaheen Plunier / Ellen Yarter vs Jennifer Kries / Martina Masarani2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Anne Neal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Ellen Yarter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Shaheen Plunier
published
3.18
Charlotte Pereira Reisch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Kerri Munson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Marie Honda
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Linda Kronseder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Jill Mastroluca
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Laurel Eriksen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri Munson + Charlotte Pereira Reisch6550% games+9.5% vs expected
Anne Neal + Charlotte Pereira Reisch5453% games+4.1% vs expected
Kerri Munson + Jill Mastroluca466546% games−3.0% vs expected
Linda Kronseder + Marie Honda6841% gamesnot enough data
Linda Kronseder + Anne Neal8647% gamesnot enough data
Anne Neal + Kerri Munson6550% gamesnot enough data
Kerri Munson + Ellen Yarter6454% gamesnot enough data
Linda Kronseder + Kerri Munson5449% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Neal
72W–71L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Ellen Yarter
82W–127L career · 9 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Shaheen Plunier
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Charlotte Pereira Reisch
95W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Kerri Munson
129W–137L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Marie Honda
48W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Linda Kronseder
50W–96L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Jill Mastroluca
87W–121L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Laurel Eriksen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.