Teams

IE-APTC-Ruby Villanueva

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-02-27vs IE-MVHS-Elvira SchlangerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRuby Villanueva / Jennifer Daniels vs Elvira Schlanger / Sue Pruitt6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCleo Collier vs Leslie Martin3-6, 4-6
2022-02-20vs IE-LLW-CL-Andrea BohnLost 01
L#1 SinglesJannah Carrasco vs Rhianna Thompson0-6, 2-6
2022-02-13vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerrie Garcia / Nanette Pratini vs Maureen Duncan / Joan Greene3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCleo Collier vs Rebecca Cloyd0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEthel Manley / Jennifer Daniels vs Tara MacHarg / Teryl Deigan6-2, 6-1
2022-02-06vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJannah Carrasco vs Kerri Munson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Daniels / Ethel Manley vs Kitty Myers / Mara Watkins7-6, 6-1
2022-01-29vs IE-CCCC-Sesilie/AmyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Daniels / Nanette Pratini vs Kathy Reeves / Sesilie Kay6-2, 7-5
2022-01-09vs IE-VMHS-Joanne HarnedWon 20
W#1 SinglesCleo Collier vs Briana Masters4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTerrie Garcia / Nanette Pratini vs Jeanie Thacker / Joanne Harned6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jane Magro
published 3.5
3.35
Jannah Carrasco
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Cleo Collier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Jennifer Daniels
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Terrie Garcia
published
3.09
Tracy DuPrez
published
3.06
Nanette Pratini
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cleo Collier + Jannah Carrasco8657% games+2.8% vs expected
Jane Magro + Jannah Carrasco5650% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jane Magro
73W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Jannah Carrasco
84W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Cleo Collier
88W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Jennifer Daniels
116W–105L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Terrie Garcia
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Tracy DuPrez
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Nanette Pratini
28W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.