Teams

IE-MTC-Jeanne Shelter

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-03-15vs IE-LLW-VMHS-Josie HendrixLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Mary Ann Neder vs Jennifer Kries / Martina Masarani2-6, 5-7
2022-03-13vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterWon 10
W#1 SinglesRebecca Cloyd vs Charlotte Pereira Reisch6-3, 6-1
2022-02-27vs IE-LLW-CL-Andrea BohnLost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Wellman / Rebecca Cloyd vs Rhianna Thompson / Tammy Kennedy5-7, 2-6
2022-02-20vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterLost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Joan Greene vs Jennifer Miller / Kerri Munson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-20vs IE-CCCC-Sesilie/AmyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Wellman / Rebecca Cloyd vs Sara Aschmann / Annette Flores6-1, 6-2
2022-02-13vs IE-CCCC-Sharon HebertWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Wellman / Rebecca Cloyd vs Dana Olague / Kathalena Cocker6-2, 6-3
2022-02-13vs IE-APTC-Ruby VillanuevaWon 10
W#1 SinglesRebecca Cloyd vs Cleo Collier6-0, 7-5
2022-02-06vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterLost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Joan Greene vs Shaheen Plunier / Jennifer Miller5-7, 4-6
2022-01-23vs IE-VMHS-Joanne HarnedWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoan Greene / Rebecca Cloyd vs Jeanie Thacker / Nath Sayasane6-4, 7-5
2022-01-22vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandLost 01
L#1 SinglesRebecca Cloyd vs Holly Birdsell2-6, 0-6
2022-01-15vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Joan Greene vs Susan Campbell-Boland / Katherine Shadid4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Rebecca Cloyd
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.70
Kim Wellman
published
3.27
Elizabeth Bentley
published 3.5
3.22
Mary Ann Neder
published
3.19
Maureen Duncan
published
3.06
Teryl Deigan
published
2.97
Joan Greene
published
Jeanne Shelter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Duncan + Elizabeth Bentley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rebecca Cloyd
92W–94L career · 11 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Kim Wellman
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
3.5
Elizabeth Bentley
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Mary Ann Neder
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.22
Maureen Duncan
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Teryl Deigan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
Joan Greene
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Jeanne Shelter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.