Teams

IE-CCCC-Sharon Hebert

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-19vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Nadine Arnaiz-Bradvica vs Kathleen Shaffer / Joan Greene7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTheresa Winterburn vs Mary Ann Neder6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-06vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterWon 10
W#1 DoublesTheresa Winterburn / Kathalena Cocker vs Ellen Yarter / Allison Smith6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-20vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandWon 10
W#1 DoublesTheresa Winterburn / Whitney Johnson vs Lori Swingle / Elvia Quintana6-1, 6-2
2022-02-13vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWhitney Johnson / Theresa Winterburn vs Judy Henning / Amanda Will6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDana Olague / Kathalena Cocker vs Kim Wellman / Rebecca Cloyd2-6, 3-6
2022-01-29vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterWon 10
W#2 DoublesWhitney Johnson / Theresa Winterburn vs Ellen Yarter / Kerri Munson6-3, 6-0
2022-01-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Dana Olague vs Josie Hendrix / Jennifer Richards6-7, 3-6
2022-01-15vs IE-LLW-VMHS-Josie HendrixLost 01
L#1 SinglesTheresa Winterburn vs Lilli Gibson6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Karen Obst
published
3.31
Kathalena Cocker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Theresa Winterburn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Sharon Hebert
published
3.24
Holly Greywood
published 3.5
Shelley Mellentine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathalena Cocker + Theresa Winterburn2340% gamesnot enough data
Kathalena Cocker + Sharon Hebert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Obst
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Kathalena Cocker
136W–140L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Theresa Winterburn
61W–45L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
Sharon Hebert
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Holly Greywood
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Shelley Mellentine
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.