← Teams

SJRC-LaMontagne

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.21 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Julie LaMontagne
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Pultz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Colleen Walker
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Catherine Greenblatt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.84
Yone Akagi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Kathleen Crowley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Katja Daoud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-03-20Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesColleen Walker / Jennifer Pultz vs Kim Tellin / Jeannette Martinez6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Ann Hays6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatja Daoud / Virginia Welch vs Cyndi Peck / April Mayers6-2, 6-2
2019-03-02Lost 1–3
L#1 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Jinquan Wu6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Pultz / Kate Quisling vs Janice Kuo / Cynthia Ross-Brockett6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCatherine Greenblatt vs Michiyo Nozaki2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYone Akagi / Kathleen Crowley vs Ellen Bradley / Laura Rich7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2019-02-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJulie LaMontagne / Catherine Greenblatt vs Stephanie Harbell / Karen Walker6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBarbara Maughan / Jennifer Pultz vs Masami Kusakabe / Cathy Jones6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesColleen Walker / Barbara Lolich vs Noelle Hamilton / Patricia Kuchar6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2019-02-16Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesYone Akagi / Kate Quisling vs Tamee Baffaro / Andria Neathamer6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCatherine Greenblatt vs Chana Dolbey6-3, 6-2
2019-02-01Won 4–1
W#1 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Yone Akagi vs Rachael Seeger / Jennifer Bifano6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesColleen Walker vs Sara Crate6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Pultz / Kate Quisling vs Deborah Wood / Emily Jones6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCatherine Greenblatt vs Kelly Felice6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatja Daoud / Daryn Peters vs Lynn Brown / Sally Papadimas6-4, 6-4
2019-01-27Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesColleen Walker / Catherine Greenblatt vs Carrie Norris / Naun Yvonne Kim7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Emily Coffee6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Pultz / Barbara Maughan vs Hitomi Tamura / Robyn Hilden4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVirginia Welch / Kathleen Crowley vs Kristy Stenberg / Lucinda Watson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2019-01-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesColleen Walker / Jennifer Pultz vs Michelle Jordan / Kerri Monello6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Shonda Waxman2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYone Akagi / Katja Daoud vs Amy Thomas / Anne Stein-Gray6-2, 6-3
2019-01-06Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCatherine Greenblatt / Julie LaMontagne vs Trish Carder / Robin Burak6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesColleen Walker vs Maryann Velez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYone Akagi / Kathleen Crowley vs Brenda Hudson / Gail Vogel6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Julie LaMontagne
85W–69L career
0%99%1%
3.31
3.5
Jennifer Pultz
112W–67L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Colleen Walker
58W–78L career
9%91%0%
3.14
3
Catherine Greenblatt
52W–81L career
0%88%12%
2.95
3
Yone Akagi
66W–52L career
0%98%2%
2.84
3
Kathleen Crowley
60W–51L career
5%94%1%
2.73
3
Katja Daoud
71W–70L career
2%98%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.