Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.80 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC81321334334
2GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC72291641364
3GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Zaragoza/EPTC#363252052408
4GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Missirian/EPTC#154212452430
5GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Gonzalez/EPTC#654202555406
6GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Johnson/EPTC#545242147359
7GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Hufft/FB45242149371
8GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Tan/EPTC#736192656436
9GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Delgado/EPTC#227172863455
10GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Maese/EPTC#418133267469

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Cristina Munoz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Artemisa Ortega
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.76
Angela de la Torre
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.23
Berenice Loubet
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.13
Claudia Abbud
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
Georgina Munoz
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Juliet Mattingly
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Linda Nassar
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Marcelle Fernandez
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Martha Canales
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Olga Carrasco
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #3 Doubles 12% · published
Priscilla Cossentino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Shannon Thomson
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Valeria Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Valerie Santos
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Nassar + Juliet Mattingly15855% games+9.7% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Shannon Thomson4549% games+8.1% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Juliet Mattingly6649% games+1.1% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Georgina Munoz41539% games+0.5% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Olga Carrasco3940% games−6.0% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Martha Canales3644% gamesnot enough data
Priscilla Cossentino + Shannon Thomson4351% gamesnot enough data
Georgina Munoz + Olga Carrasco3453% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cristina Munoz
33W–24L career · 17 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Artemisa Ortega
51W–49L career · 18 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Angela de la Torre
49W–33L career · 13 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.76
3.5
Berenice Loubet
32W–31L career · 17 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Claudia Abbud
55W–104L career · 19 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Georgina Munoz
35W–78L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juliet Mattingly
89W–58L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Nassar
60W–38L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcelle Fernandez
25W–11L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Canales
59W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Olga Carrasco
32W–44L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Priscilla Cossentino
32W–53L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Thomson
64W–53L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valeria Delgado
26W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valerie Santos
128W–66L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.