Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Delgado/EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-11-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesFabiola Ordonez / Sophia Borrego vs Miranda Silva / Daniela Cano3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC81321334334
2GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC72291641364
3GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Zaragoza/EPTC#363252052408
4GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Missirian/EPTC#154212452430
5GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Gonzalez/EPTC#654202555406
6GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Johnson/EPTC#545242147359
7GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Hufft/FB45242149371
8GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Tan/EPTC#736192656436
9GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Delgado/EPTC#227172863455
10GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Maese/EPTC#418133267469

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Allison Glass
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.18
Anna Camille Kerr
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.56
Danielle Apodaca
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
Erika Delgado
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Fabiola Ordonez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Fabiola P Hinojos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Hannah Juarez
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Iyari Fierro
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
Kate Colbert
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mariel Berdeja
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
Monica Medina
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Rochelle Rosas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sophia Borrego
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Delgado + Kate Colbert12460% gamesnot enough data
Monica Medina + Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca6355% gamesnot enough data
Hannah Juarez + Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca6163% gamesnot enough data
Hannah Juarez + Allison Glass6158% gamesnot enough data
Fabiola P Hinojos + Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca2351% gamesnot enough data
Erika Delgado + Hannah Juarez4162% gamesnot enough data
Erika Delgado + Rochelle Rosas4154% gamesnot enough data
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca + Allison Glass4170% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Glass
31W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Anna Camille Kerr
42W–28L career · 18 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Danielle Apodaca
1W–10L career · 10 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
2.56
Erika Delgado
107W–52L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Fabiola Ordonez
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Fabiola P Hinojos
25W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hannah Juarez
79W–45L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Iyari Fierro
28W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kate Colbert
53W–20L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
45W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariel Berdeja
21W–19L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca
44W–34L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Medina
38W–25L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rochelle Rosas
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sophia Borrego
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.