Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Hufft/FB

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC81321334334
2GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC72291641364
3GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Zaragoza/EPTC#363252052408
4GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Missirian/EPTC#154212452430
5GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Gonzalez/EPTC#654202555406
6GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Johnson/EPTC#545242147359
7GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Hufft/FB45242149371
8GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Tan/EPTC#736192656436
9GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Delgado/EPTC#227172863455
10GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Maese/EPTC#418133267469

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Cheryl Ledford
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Carol Shannon
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 4
Eunsook Yoo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Helga Sauza
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
Laura Lama
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Lia Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #1 Singles 28% · published
Melissa Arriola
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 11% · published
Melissa Hufft
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Monica Morga
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Patricia Dalbin
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Rebecca Loweree
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Rossana Roacho
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Yolanda Zuverza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Morga + Rebecca Loweree101150% games+0.9% vs expected
Rossana Roacho + Patricia Dalbin37960% games−0.9% vs expected
Carol Shannon + Lia Shelton404 matchesnot enough data
Yolanda Zuverza + Melissa Hufft314 matchesnot enough data
Monica Morga + Lia Shelton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Ledford
37W–52L career · 15 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Carol Shannon
57W–61L career · 21 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Eunsook Yoo
71W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Helga Sauza
74W–41L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Lama
20W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lia Shelton
141W–90L career · 39 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Arriola
36W–29L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Hufft
98W–71L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Morga
70W–72L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Dalbin
99W–72L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Loweree
57W–51L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rossana Roacho
123W–115L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yolanda Zuverza
53W–49L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.