Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Missirian/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-01vs GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Johnson/EPTC#5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesXochitl Benitez / Paula Prado vs Xanthe Phillips / Debbie Pippins5-7, 3-6
2025-10-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesCathey Jo Alberson / Xochitl Benitez vs Ashley Bowling / Margaret Meyer6-4, 6-1
2025-10-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesXochitl Benitez / Zulem Bordier vs Stephanie Kwan / Lori DeLisser2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesXochitl Benitez / Zulem Bordier vs Juliet Mattingly / Valeria Delgado6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC81321334334
2GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC72291641364
3GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Zaragoza/EPTC#363252052408
4GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Missirian/EPTC#154212452430
5GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Gonzalez/EPTC#654202555406
6GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Johnson/EPTC#545242147359
7GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Hufft/FB45242149371
8GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Tan/EPTC#736192656436
9GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Delgado/EPTC#227172863455
10GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Maese/EPTC#418133267469

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Erika Licon
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 4
3.70
Cathey Jo Alberson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 4
3.66
Angelica Ares
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
Karla Nahomi Marroquin
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Lillian Ordonez
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Linda Rowse
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Marisa Porras
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Isaac
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Niria Yepo
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paula Prado
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Radel Farrah
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rosanna Missirian
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Vanessa Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Veronica Perusquia
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Xochitl Benitez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Zulem Bordier
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zulem Bordier + Erika Licon9457% games+10.2% vs expected
Rosanna Missirian + Erika Licon8953% games−6.3% vs expected
Cathey Jo Alberson + Radel Farrah9655% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Porras + Erika Licon9261% gamesnot enough data
Niria Yepo + Lillian Ordonez10161% gamesnot enough data
Vanessa Herrera + Melissa Isaac3451% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Porras + Paula Prado3354% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Porras + Niria Yepo4251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erika Licon
76W–61L career · 22 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Cathey Jo Alberson
45W–26L career · 14 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Angelica Ares
65W–58L career · 20 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
Karla Nahomi Marroquin
18W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lillian Ordonez
87W–41L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Rowse
41W–17L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marisa Porras
94W–53L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Isaac
107W–107L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Niria Yepo
43W–29L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paula Prado
42W–46L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Radel Farrah
59W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rosanna Missirian
112W–86L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vanessa Herrera
45W–66L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Veronica Perusquia
20W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Xochitl Benitez
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zulem Bordier
95W–63L career · 33 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.