Teams

Fretz/Livengood X7.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & over MIXED Sunday · X7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-27vs Buffalo Creek/Nuytten-Powell X7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi Aiken / Matt Doxtator vs Sean Smith / Kathryn Dehmer6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesREGINA RIVERA / Suhail Nair vs Vance Miller / Allison Waldron6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLiliann Nguyen / Harinath Atmaram vs Isaac Mckee / Heidi McKee6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-20vs Oak Creek/Christian X7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesCourtney Vorel / Gustavo Lopez vs Amber Playle / Raj Sidhu4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesREGINA RIVERA / Jason Vorel vs Kilvia Edwards / Lance Christian6-0, 7-5
2025-07-13vs Canyon Creek/Jost X7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesJOSALYN SAMSON / William Manhkong vs Dawn Cotter / Carl Cotter6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRyan Livengood / Courtney Vorel vs Lisa Ragle / Doug Hipskind6-2, 6-4
2025-06-22vs High Point/Kurinji X7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesJOSALYN SAMSON / Ryan Livengood vs Jennifer Bishop / Gregie Eldo2-1
W#2 DoublesHeidi Aiken / Todd Johnson vs Kelly Britson / Jaime Rodriguez4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Richter / Jason Vorel vs Christine Slote / Jigish Shah6-0, 6-3
2025-06-15vs The Nelson/Harner X7.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesTina Hoang / Jason Vorel vs Christopher Harner / Samantha Wicker6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Gulbas / Liliann Nguyen vs Julie Harner / Joe Johnson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-08vs Garland/Lv X7.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesMary Helen Nine / Jeff Gulbas vs Erma Bryant / Cheng Wang1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Aiken / Ryan Livengood vs Tao Kang / Kuangting Shiue6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · X7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Garland/Nguyen X7.0601626115
2Oak Creek/Coates X7.051162588
3Fretz/Livengood X7.05114413140
4Garland/Lv X7.05113515141
5The Nelson/Harner X7.04213515135
6Oak Creek/Christian X7.0339920180
7Bent Tree/Sarche X7.03381022173
8Fretz/Conwill X7.03361225178
9McKinney/Hong X7.02481023176
10High Point/Kurinji X7.02461224181
11Greenhill/Sanders-Madden X7.01551327182
12Canyon Creek/Jost X7.01551327186
13Chandlers Landing/Meacham X7.01541429194
14Buffalo Creek/Nuytten-Powell X7.01531533208

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
William Manhkong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.96
Ryan Livengood
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.83
Matt Doxtator
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Liliann Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Jason Vorel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
REGINA RIVERA
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Suhail Nair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Mary Helen Nine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Jeff Gulbas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Heidi Aiken
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
JOSALYN SAMSON
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Courtney Vorel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Harinath Atmaram
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jennifer Richter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Aiken + Ryan Livengood303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Manhkong
26W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
Ryan Livengood
52W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
Matt Doxtator
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
Liliann Nguyen
14W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Jason Vorel
29W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
REGINA RIVERA
24W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Suhail Nair
26W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Mary Helen Nine
10W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Jeff Gulbas
32W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Heidi Aiken
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
JOSALYN SAMSON
11W–14L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Courtney Vorel
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Harinath Atmaram
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Richter
24W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.